Feng Xiaocan vs.
Shi Ming
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Feng Xiaocan
Full career not yet synced for Feng Xiaocan — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Shi Ming
Full career not yet synced for Shi Ming — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Feng Xiaocan
Distance 98.0% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 1.0% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 1.0% (norm 5.0%)
Shi Ming
Distance 93.5% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 3.7% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 2.8% (norm 5.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Feng Xiaocan
Head 75.5% (norm 76.4%) · Body 6.9% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 17.6% (norm 9.1%)
Shi Ming
Head 70.4% (norm 76.4%) · Body 22.2% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 7.4% (norm 9.1%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Xiaocan L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med | Ming L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 47 / 100 | 47.0% | 38.3% | 28 / 101 | 27.7% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 0 / 1 | too few to rate | 72.6% | 0 / 4 | too few to rate | 72.6% |
| On the ground | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 75.0% | 2 / 3 | too few to rate | 75.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 29 / 77 | 37.7% | 35.4% | 13 / 76 | 17.1% | 35.4% |
| To the body | 2 / 7 | too few to rate | 69.3% | 11 / 24 | too few to rate | 69.3% |
| To the legs | 17 / 18 | too few to rate | 77.9% | 6 / 8 | too few to rate | 77.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters · Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Xiaocan L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med | vs Ming L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 28 / 101 | 27.7% | 39.7% | 47 / 100 | 47.0% | 39.7% |
| In the clinch | 0 / 4 | too few to rate | 71.5% | 0 / 1 | too few to rate | 71.5% |
| On the ground | 2 / 3 | too few to rate | 74.4% | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 74.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 13 / 76 | 17.1% | 36.0% | 29 / 77 | 37.7% | 36.0% |
| To the body | 11 / 24 | too few to rate | 68.4% | 2 / 7 | too few to rate | 68.4% |
| To the legs | 6 / 8 | too few to rate | 79.1% | 17 / 18 | too few to rate | 79.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Xiaocan has more cage time on record.