Xiao Long vs.
Quang Le
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Xiao Long
Full career not yet synced for Xiao Long — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.8 wins over .500
Quang Le
Full career not yet synced for Quang Le — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 1-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.2 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Xiao Long
Distance 80.1% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 18.6% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 1.3% (norm 6.5%)
Quang Le
Distance 94.3% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 3.4% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 2.3% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Xiao Long
Head 67.6% (norm 77.4%) · Body 18.0% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 14.4% (norm 8.4%)
Quang Le
Head 81.3% (norm 77.4%) · Body 15.3% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 3.4% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Long L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med | Le L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 195 / 494 | 39.5% | 39.0% | 94 / 247 | 38.1% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 80 / 115 | 69.6% | 68.7% | 7 / 9 | too few to rate | 68.7% |
| On the ground | 7 / 8 | too few to rate | 70.2% | 1 / 6 | too few to rate | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 157 / 417 | 37.6% | 34.9% | 63 / 213 | 29.6% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 67 / 111 | 60.4% | 66.8% | 32 / 40 | 80.0% | 66.8% |
| To the legs | 58 / 89 | 65.2% | 79.4% | 7 / 9 | too few to rate | 79.4% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Bantamweight: 117 fighters · Bantamweight: 117 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Long L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med | vs Le L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 141 / 318 | 44.3% | 39.3% | 152 / 308 | 49.4% | 39.3% |
| In the clinch | 93 / 120 | 77.5% | 70.4% | 9 / 15 | too few to rate | 70.4% |
| On the ground | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 72.4% | 5 / 7 | too few to rate | 72.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 124 / 306 | 40.5% | 34.9% | 103 / 241 | 42.7% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 98 / 117 | 83.8% | 66.0% | 14 / 24 | too few to rate | 66.0% |
| To the legs | 12 / 15 | too few to rate | 79.1% | 49 / 65 | 75.4% | 79.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Long has more cage time on record.