Tom Duquesnoy vs.
Patrick Williams
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Tom Duquesnoy
Full career not yet synced for Tom Duquesnoy — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.3 wins over .500
Patrick Williams
Full career not yet synced for Patrick Williams — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 1-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Tom Duquesnoy
Distance 90.0% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 9.0% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 1.0% (norm 6.5%)
Patrick Williams
Distance 78.3% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 20.4% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 1.4% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Tom Duquesnoy
Head 71.0% (norm 77.4%) · Body 15.3% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 13.7% (norm 8.4%)
Patrick Williams
Head 60.2% (norm 77.4%) · Body 18.1% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 21.7% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Duquesnoy L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med | Williams L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 115 / 270 | 42.6% | 39.0% | 87 / 173 | 50.3% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 20 / 27 | 74.1% | 68.7% | 26 / 45 | 57.8% | 68.7% |
| On the ground | 1 / 3 | too few to rate | 70.2% | 1 / 3 | too few to rate | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 66 / 213 | 31.0% | 34.9% | 43 / 133 | 32.3% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 30 / 46 | 65.2% | 66.8% | 28 / 40 | 70.0% | 66.8% |
| To the legs | 40 / 41 | 97.6% | 79.4% | 43 / 48 | 89.6% | 79.4% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Bantamweight: 117 fighters · Bantamweight: 117 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Duquesnoy L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med | vs Williams L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 145 / 446 | 32.5% | 39.3% | 70 / 176 | 39.8% | 39.3% |
| In the clinch | 29 / 47 | 61.7% | 70.4% | 41 / 58 | 70.7% | 70.4% |
| On the ground | 14 / 15 | too few to rate | 72.4% | 3 / 5 | too few to rate | 72.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 113 / 405 | 27.9% | 34.9% | 76 / 195 | 39.0% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 45 / 63 | 71.4% | 66.0% | 29 / 34 | 85.3% | 66.0% |
| To the legs | 30 / 40 | 75.0% | 79.1% | 9 / 10 | too few to rate | 79.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Williams has more cage time on record.