Stephanie Egger vs.
Irina Alekseeva
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Stephanie Egger
Full career not yet synced for Stephanie Egger — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 1-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.6 wins over .500
Irina Alekseeva
Full career not yet synced for Irina Alekseeva — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 1-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Stephanie Egger
Distance 76.0% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 10.9% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 13.2% (norm 7.5%)
Irina Alekseeva
Distance 94.9% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 3.7% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 1.4% (norm 7.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Stephanie Egger
Head 80.6% (norm 75.2%) · Body 9.7% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 9.7% (norm 8.8%)
Irina Alekseeva
Head 66.9% (norm 75.2%) · Body 13.9% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 19.3% (norm 8.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Egger L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med | Alekseeva L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 67 / 196 | 34.2% | 38.3% | 125 / 335 | 37.3% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 23 / 28 | 82.1% | 73.3% | 8 / 13 | too few to rate | 73.3% |
| On the ground | 30 / 34 | 88.2% | 70.8% | 2 / 5 | too few to rate | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 80 / 208 | 38.5% | 37.7% | 68 / 236 | 28.8% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 19 / 25 | 76.0% | 70.0% | 25 / 49 | 51.0% | 70.0% |
| To the legs | 21 / 25 | 84.0% | 80.9% | 42 / 68 | 61.8% | 80.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Egger L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med | vs Alekseeva L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 112 / 245 | 45.7% | 41.3% | 146 / 282 | 51.8% | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 10 / 18 | too few to rate | 74.7% | 6 / 7 | too few to rate | 74.7% |
| On the ground | 13 / 19 | too few to rate | 74.2% | 46 / 74 | 62.2% | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 55 / 174 | 31.6% | 38.1% | 148 / 301 | 49.2% | 38.1% |
| To the body | 52 / 71 | 73.2% | 73.2% | 26 / 36 | 72.2% | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 28 / 37 | 75.7% | 80.9% | 24 / 26 | 92.3% | 80.9% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Egger has more cage time on record.