Sarah Moras vs. Macy Chiasson
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Sarah Moras
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 3 | 6 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 1 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 2 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.51 · 4 tier-1/2 wins · 5 finish wins over 13 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.2 wins over .500
Macy Chiasson
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 8 | 6 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 2 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.13 · 8 tier-1/2 wins · 6 finish wins over 16 documented bouts
In the UFC: 3-5 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.3 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Sarah Moras
Distance 80.2% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 4.7% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 15.1% (norm 7.5%)
Macy Chiasson
Distance 65.0% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 18.5% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 16.4% (norm 7.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Sarah Moras
Head 85.6% (norm 75.2%) · Body 7.6% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 6.8% (norm 8.8%)
Macy Chiasson
Head 72.3% (norm 75.2%) · Body 21.7% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 6.0% (norm 8.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Moras L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med | Chiasson L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 163 / 601 | 27.1% | 38.3% | 237 / 692 | 34.2% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 17 / 35 | 48.6% | 73.3% | 150 / 197 | 76.1% | 73.3% |
| On the ground | 77 / 113 | 68.1% | 70.8% | 103 / 175 | 58.9% | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 177 / 641 | 27.6% | 37.7% | 268 / 769 | 34.9% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 35 / 57 | 61.4% | 70.0% | 173 / 231 | 74.9% | 70.0% |
| To the legs | 45 / 51 | 88.2% | 80.9% | 49 / 64 | 76.6% | 80.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Moras L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med | vs Chiasson L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 254 / 592 | 42.9% | 41.3% | 233 / 519 | 44.9% | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 16 / 21 | too few to rate | 74.7% | 135 / 178 | 75.8% | 74.7% |
| On the ground | 133 / 201 | 66.2% | 74.2% | 53 / 67 | 79.1% | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 310 / 706 | 43.9% | 38.1% | 255 / 544 | 46.9% | 38.1% |
| To the body | 60 / 72 | 83.3% | 73.2% | 127 / 170 | 74.7% | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 33 / 36 | 91.7% | 80.9% | 39 / 50 | 78.0% | 80.9% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Chiasson has more cage time on record.