Sarah Alpar vs.
Erin Blanchfield
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Sarah Alpar
Full career not yet synced for Sarah Alpar — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Erin Blanchfield
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 8 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 6 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.65 · 8 tier-1/2 wins · 7 finish wins over 16 documented bouts
In the UFC: 7-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +3.8 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Sarah Alpar
Distance 97.9% (norm 87.6%) · Clinch 2.1% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 0.0% (norm 4.9%)
Erin Blanchfield
Distance 86.1% (norm 87.6%) · Clinch 4.7% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 9.2% (norm 4.9%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Sarah Alpar
Head 71.3% (norm 78.1%) · Body 13.3% (norm 14.2%) · Legs 15.4% (norm 7.7%)
Erin Blanchfield
Head 84.3% (norm 78.1%) · Body 9.0% (norm 14.2%) · Legs 6.8% (norm 7.7%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Alpar L/A | Acc | Women's Flyweight med | Blanchfield L/A | Acc | Women's Flyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 52 / 140 | 37.1% | 39.9% | 496 / 1247 | 39.8% | 39.9% |
| In the clinch | 1 / 3 | too few to rate | 73.3% | 43 / 68 | 63.2% | 73.3% |
| On the ground | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 74.7% | 104 / 133 | 78.2% | 74.7% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 25 / 102 | 24.5% | 34.9% | 454 / 1220 | 37.2% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 11 / 19 | too few to rate | 69.5% | 102 / 130 | 78.5% | 69.5% |
| To the legs | 17 / 22 | too few to rate | 82.6% | 87 / 98 | 88.8% | 82.6% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Flyweight: 46 fighters · Women's Flyweight: 46 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Alpar L/A | Opp acc | Women's Flyweight med | vs Blanchfield L/A | Opp acc | Women's Flyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 68 / 151 | 45.0% | 38.8% | 496 / 1208 | 41.1% | 38.8% |
| In the clinch | 35 / 39 | 89.7% | 74.1% | 25 / 56 | 44.6% | 74.1% |
| On the ground | 93 / 126 | 73.8% | 73.4% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 73.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 160 / 277 | 57.8% | 35.3% | 365 / 1058 | 34.5% | 35.3% |
| To the body | 24 / 27 | 88.9% | 69.0% | 76 / 120 | 63.3% | 69.0% |
| To the legs | 12 / 12 | too few to rate | 78.7% | 80 / 86 | 93.0% | 78.7% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Blanchfield has more cage time on record.