Sara McMann vs. Lina Lansberg
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Sara McMann
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 8 | 7 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 6 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.88 · 8 tier-1/2 wins · 6 finish wins over 21 documented bouts
In the UFC: 3-5 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.3 wins over .500
Lina Lansberg
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 4 | 7 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 2 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 4 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.49 · 6 tier-1/2 wins · 4 finish wins over 18 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.6 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Sara McMann
Distance 59.5% (norm 80.4%) · Clinch 11.5% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 29.0% (norm 7.3%)
Lina Lansberg
Distance 58.7% (norm 80.4%) · Clinch 29.7% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 11.5% (norm 7.3%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Sara McMann
Head 78.4% (norm 75.5%) · Body 16.0% (norm 15.0%) · Legs 5.7% (norm 8.7%)
Lina Lansberg
Head 69.8% (norm 75.5%) · Body 25.2% (norm 15.0%) · Legs 5.0% (norm 8.7%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | McMann L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med | Lansberg L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 90 / 347 | 25.9% | 38.5% | 159 / 413 | 38.5% | 38.5% |
| In the clinch | 55 / 67 | 82.1% | 74.3% | 170 / 209 | 81.3% | 74.3% |
| On the ground | 114 / 169 | 67.5% | 70.8% | 61 / 81 | 75.3% | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 166 / 457 | 36.3% | 37.7% | 206 / 491 | 42.0% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 67 / 93 | 72.0% | 71.1% | 154 / 177 | 87.0% | 71.1% |
| To the legs | 26 / 33 | 78.8% | 80.8% | 30 / 35 | 85.7% | 80.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Bantamweight: 41 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 41 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs McMann L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med | vs Lansberg L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 109 / 282 | 38.7% | 41.3% | 270 / 626 | 43.1% | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 55 / 65 | 84.6% | 75.0% | 182 / 231 | 78.8% | 75.0% |
| On the ground | 91 / 109 | 83.5% | 74.2% | 108 / 145 | 74.5% | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 193 / 384 | 50.3% | 37.7% | 312 / 702 | 44.4% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 43 / 52 | 82.7% | 73.2% | 193 / 232 | 83.2% | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 19 / 20 | too few to rate | 80.9% | 55 / 68 | 80.9% | 80.9% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — McMann has more cage time on record.