Quillan Salkilld vs. Mateusz Gamrot
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Quillan Salkilld
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 6 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 6 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.73 · 6 tier-1/2 wins · 9 finish wins over 13 documented bouts
In the UFC: 4-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +3.7 wins over .500
Mateusz Gamrot
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 9 | 4 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 1 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 16 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.38 · 10 tier-1/2 wins · 14 finish wins over 31 documented bouts
In the UFC: 8-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +4.6 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Quillan Salkilld
Distance 72.9% (norm 83.1%) · Clinch 15.1% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 11.9% (norm 8.0%)
Mateusz Gamrot
Distance 83.0% (norm 83.1%) · Clinch 3.8% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 13.2% (norm 8.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Quillan Salkilld
Head 75.2% (norm 78.0%) · Body 17.0% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 7.8% (norm 8.0%)
Mateusz Gamrot
Head 85.2% (norm 78.0%) · Body 9.5% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 5.2% (norm 8.0%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Salkilld L/A | Acc | Lightweight med | Gamrot L/A | Acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 86 / 159 | 54.1% | 38.3% | 378 / 810 | 46.7% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 22 / 33 | 66.7% | 67.5% | 32 / 37 | 86.5% | 67.5% |
| On the ground | 18 / 26 | 69.2% | 68.8% | 91 / 129 | 70.5% | 68.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 82 / 164 | 50.0% | 35.1% | 385 / 832 | 46.3% | 35.1% |
| To the body | 29 / 37 | 78.4% | 69.1% | 68 / 93 | 73.1% | 69.1% |
| To the legs | 15 / 17 | too few to rate | 81.8% | 48 / 51 | 94.1% | 81.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Lightweight: 204 fighters · Lightweight: 204 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Salkilld L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med | vs Gamrot L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 37 / 87 | 42.5% | 38.8% | 384 / 1038 | 37.0% | 38.8% |
| In the clinch | 16 / 21 | too few to rate | 68.6% | 26 / 36 | 72.2% | 68.6% |
| On the ground | 5 / 7 | too few to rate | 68.0% | 35 / 40 | 87.5% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 44 / 96 | 45.8% | 35.2% | 229 / 795 | 28.8% | 35.2% |
| To the body | 9 / 14 | too few to rate | 68.2% | 152 / 236 | 64.4% | 68.2% |
| To the legs | 5 / 5 | too few to rate | 81.5% | 64 / 83 | 77.1% | 81.5% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Gamrot has more cage time on record.