Priscila Cachoeira vs. Nina Milosevic
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Priscila Cachoeira
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 5 | 9 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 8 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.62 · 5 tier-1/2 wins · 8 finish wins over 22 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-5 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.1 wins over .500
Nina Milosevic
Full career not yet synced for Nina Milosevic — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -3.0 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Priscila Cachoeira
Distance 92.2% (norm 87.5%) · Clinch 5.0% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 2.8% (norm 4.5%)
Nina Milosevic
Distance 76.9% (norm 80.4%) · Clinch 23.1% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 0.0% (norm 7.3%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Priscila Cachoeira
Head 85.0% (norm 78.1%) · Body 10.3% (norm 14.5%) · Legs 4.7% (norm 7.6%)
Nina Milosevic
Head 74.4% (norm 75.5%) · Body 25.6% (norm 15.0%) · Legs 0.0% (norm 8.7%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Cachoeira L/A | Acc | Women's Flyweight med | Milosevic L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 462 / 1097 | 42.1% | 40.3% | 16 / 30 | 53.3% | 38.5% |
| In the clinch | 42 / 60 | 70.0% | 73.9% | 5 / 9 | too few to rate | 74.3% |
| On the ground | 24 / 33 | 72.7% | 74.4% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 394 / 1012 | 38.9% | 36.0% | 14 / 29 | 48.3% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 86 / 122 | 70.5% | 69.5% | 7 / 10 | too few to rate | 71.1% |
| To the legs | 48 / 56 | 85.7% | 82.3% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 80.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Flyweight: 47 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 41 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Cachoeira L/A | Opp acc | Women's Flyweight med | vs Milosevic L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 640 / 1338 | 47.8% | 39.0% | 12 / 45 | 26.7% | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 50 / 88 | 56.8% | 73.8% | 1 / 3 | too few to rate | 75.0% |
| On the ground | 215 / 249 | 86.3% | 73.4% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 718 / 1425 | 50.4% | 35.0% | 7 / 36 | 19.4% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 127 / 183 | 69.4% | 69.0% | 5 / 11 | too few to rate | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 60 / 67 | 89.6% | 78.7% | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 80.9% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Cachoeira has more cage time on record.