Oliver Enkamp vs.
Danny Roberts
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Oliver Enkamp
Full career not yet synced for Oliver Enkamp — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.5 wins over .500
Danny Roberts
Full career not yet synced for Danny Roberts — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 1-5 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.4 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Oliver Enkamp
Distance 83.2% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 16.8% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 0.0% (norm 8.1%)
Danny Roberts
Distance 80.4% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 11.5% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 8.1% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Oliver Enkamp
Head 63.7% (norm 78.2%) · Body 22.1% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 14.2% (norm 8.4%)
Danny Roberts
Head 78.1% (norm 78.2%) · Body 14.3% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 7.6% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Enkamp L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | Roberts L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 27 / 94 | 28.7% | 38.6% | 262 / 823 | 31.8% | 38.6% |
| In the clinch | 14 / 19 | too few to rate | 67.8% | 82 / 118 | 69.5% | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 67.2% | 61 / 83 | 73.5% | 67.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 16 / 72 | 22.2% | 37.2% | 233 / 800 | 29.1% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 15 / 25 | 60.0% | 70.7% | 106 / 146 | 72.6% | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 10 / 16 | too few to rate | 82.9% | 66 / 78 | 84.6% | 82.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 182 fighters · Welterweight: 182 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Enkamp L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs Roberts L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 42 / 75 | 56.0% | 39.0% | 315 / 731 | 43.1% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 6 / 9 | too few to rate | 68.9% | 105 / 159 | 66.0% | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 13 / 14 | too few to rate | 68.0% | 54 / 77 | 70.1% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 40 / 71 | 56.3% | 35.6% | 336 / 774 | 43.4% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 10 / 12 | too few to rate | 69.6% | 92 / 137 | 67.2% | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 11 / 15 | too few to rate | 82.1% | 46 / 56 | 82.1% | 82.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Roberts has more cage time on record.