Nadia Kassem vs.
Alex Chambers
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Nadia Kassem
Full career not yet synced for Nadia Kassem — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.3 wins over .500
Alex Chambers
Full career not yet synced for Alex Chambers — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.2 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Nadia Kassem
Distance 84.8% (norm 87.6%) · Clinch 9.5% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 5.8% (norm 4.9%)
Alex Chambers
Distance 71.6% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 22.0% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 6.4% (norm 5.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Nadia Kassem
Head 55.6% (norm 78.1%) · Body 34.6% (norm 14.2%) · Legs 9.9% (norm 7.7%)
Alex Chambers
Head 64.8% (norm 76.4%) · Body 16.8% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 18.4% (norm 9.1%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Kassem L/A | Acc | Women's Flyweight med | Chambers L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 79 / 206 | 38.3% | 39.9% | 88 / 179 | 49.2% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 16 / 23 | too few to rate | 73.3% | 32 / 55 | 58.2% | 72.6% |
| On the ground | 7 / 14 | too few to rate | 74.7% | 15 / 16 | too few to rate | 75.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 35 / 135 | 25.9% | 34.9% | 78 / 162 | 48.1% | 35.4% |
| To the body | 49 / 84 | 58.3% | 69.5% | 29 / 42 | 69.0% | 69.3% |
| To the legs | 18 / 24 | too few to rate | 82.6% | 28 / 46 | 60.9% | 77.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Flyweight: 46 fighters · Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Kassem L/A | Opp acc | Women's Flyweight med | vs Chambers L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 110 / 237 | 46.4% | 38.8% | 120 / 295 | 40.7% | 39.7% |
| In the clinch | 7 / 13 | too few to rate | 74.1% | 80 / 131 | 61.1% | 71.5% |
| On the ground | 29 / 34 | 85.3% | 73.4% | 32 / 43 | 74.4% | 74.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 112 / 232 | 48.3% | 35.3% | 132 / 324 | 40.7% | 36.0% |
| To the body | 23 / 31 | 74.2% | 69.0% | 66 / 98 | 67.3% | 68.4% |
| To the legs | 11 / 21 | too few to rate | 78.7% | 34 / 47 | 72.3% | 79.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Chambers has more cage time on record.