Luke Cummo vs.
Tamdan McCrory
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Luke Cummo
Full career not yet synced for Luke Cummo — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 1-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.4 wins over .500
Tamdan McCrory
Full career not yet synced for Tamdan McCrory — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 1-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.3 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Luke Cummo
Distance 67.1% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 19.7% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 13.2% (norm 8.1%)
Tamdan McCrory
Distance 50.0% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 18.0% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 32.0% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Luke Cummo
Head 72.1% (norm 78.2%) · Body 22.1% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 5.9% (norm 8.4%)
Tamdan McCrory
Head 80.2% (norm 78.2%) · Body 12.5% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 7.3% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Cummo L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | McCrory L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 82 / 228 | 36.0% | 38.6% | 59 / 164 | 36.0% | 38.6% |
| In the clinch | 39 / 67 | 58.2% | 67.8% | 33 / 59 | 55.9% | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 26 / 45 | 57.8% | 67.2% | 68 / 105 | 64.8% | 67.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 78 / 245 | 31.8% | 37.2% | 109 / 263 | 41.4% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 50 / 75 | 66.7% | 70.7% | 31 / 41 | 75.6% | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 19 / 20 | too few to rate | 82.9% | 20 / 24 | too few to rate | 82.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 182 fighters · Welterweight: 182 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Cummo L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs McCrory L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 30 / 142 | 21.1% | 39.0% | 68 / 142 | 47.9% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 23 / 36 | 63.9% | 68.9% | 9 / 15 | too few to rate | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 74 / 136 | 54.4% | 68.0% | 47 / 74 | 63.5% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 91 / 264 | 34.5% | 35.6% | 53 / 134 | 39.6% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 22 / 31 | 71.0% | 69.6% | 36 / 49 | 73.5% | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 14 / 19 | too few to rate | 82.1% | 35 / 48 | 72.9% | 82.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — McCrory has more cage time on record.