Kwan Ho Kwak vs.
Brett Johns
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Kwan Ho Kwak
Full career not yet synced for Kwan Ho Kwak — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -1.0 wins over .500
Brett Johns
Full career not yet synced for Brett Johns — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 1-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.0 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Kwan Ho Kwak
Distance 91.4% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 7.9% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 0.7% (norm 6.5%)
Brett Johns
Distance 72.1% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 7.4% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 20.5% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Kwan Ho Kwak
Head 78.3% (norm 77.4%) · Body 12.5% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 9.2% (norm 8.4%)
Brett Johns
Head 91.1% (norm 77.4%) · Body 6.8% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 2.1% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Kwak L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med | Johns L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 54 / 139 | 38.8% | 39.0% | 136 / 372 | 36.6% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 9 / 12 | too few to rate | 68.7% | 32 / 38 | 84.2% | 68.7% |
| On the ground | 0 / 1 | too few to rate | 70.2% | 85 / 106 | 80.2% | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 40 / 119 | 33.6% | 34.9% | 222 / 470 | 47.2% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 12 / 19 | too few to rate | 66.8% | 23 / 35 | 65.7% | 66.8% |
| To the legs | 11 / 14 | too few to rate | 79.4% | 8 / 11 | too few to rate | 79.4% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Bantamweight: 117 fighters · Bantamweight: 117 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Kwak L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med | vs Johns L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 39 / 90 | 43.3% | 39.3% | 217 / 551 | 39.4% | 39.3% |
| In the clinch | 1 / 2 | too few to rate | 70.4% | 79 / 107 | 73.8% | 70.4% |
| On the ground | 26 / 34 | 76.5% | 72.4% | 43 / 70 | 61.4% | 72.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 58 / 111 | 52.3% | 34.9% | 200 / 540 | 37.0% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 4 / 10 | too few to rate | 66.0% | 78 / 114 | 68.4% | 66.0% |
| To the legs | 4 / 5 | too few to rate | 79.1% | 61 / 74 | 82.4% | 79.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Johns has more cage time on record.