Jamall Emmers vs. Jack Jenkins
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Jamall Emmers
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 5 | 5 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 5 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 12 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.9 · 10 tier-1/2 wins · 12 finish wins over 30 documented bouts
In the UFC: 2-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.5 wins over .500
Jack Jenkins
Full career not yet synced for Jack Jenkins — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.4 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Jamall Emmers
Distance 87.4% (norm 85.9%) · Clinch 6.8% (norm 6.0%) · Ground 5.9% (norm 6.5%)
Jack Jenkins
Distance 80.8% (norm 85.9%) · Clinch 8.6% (norm 6.0%) · Ground 10.6% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Jamall Emmers
Head 70.0% (norm 77.5%) · Body 20.2% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 9.8% (norm 7.9%)
Jack Jenkins
Head 64.5% (norm 77.5%) · Body 16.9% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 18.6% (norm 7.9%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Emmers L/A | Acc | Featherweight med | Jenkins L/A | Acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 353 / 802 | 44.0% | 40.5% | 303 / 556 | 54.5% | 40.5% |
| In the clinch | 47 / 62 | 75.8% | 70.5% | 46 / 59 | 78.0% | 70.5% |
| On the ground | 39 / 54 | 72.2% | 69.3% | 48 / 73 | 65.8% | 69.3% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 249 / 643 | 38.7% | 37.1% | 200 / 444 | 45.0% | 37.1% |
| To the body | 131 / 185 | 70.8% | 68.0% | 95 / 116 | 81.9% | 68.0% |
| To the legs | 59 / 90 | 65.6% | 80.3% | 102 / 128 | 79.7% | 80.3% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Featherweight: 127 fighters · Featherweight: 127 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Emmers L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med | vs Jenkins L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 279 / 720 | 38.8% | 39.3% | 237 / 629 | 37.7% | 39.3% |
| In the clinch | 31 / 51 | 60.8% | 70.3% | 41 / 61 | 67.2% | 70.3% |
| On the ground | 13 / 15 | too few to rate | 69.4% | 31 / 36 | 86.1% | 69.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 197 / 588 | 33.5% | 35.9% | 172 / 510 | 33.7% | 35.9% |
| To the body | 58 / 96 | 60.4% | 68.0% | 75 / 131 | 57.3% | 68.0% |
| To the legs | 68 / 102 | 66.7% | 81.5% | 62 / 85 | 72.9% | 81.5% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Emmers has more cage time on record.