Hyder Amil vs.
William Gomis
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Hyder Amil
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 7 | 3 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 3 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 1 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.61 · 10 tier-1/2 wins · 7 finish wins over 14 documented bouts
In the UFC: 2-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.8 wins over .500
William Gomis
Full career not yet synced for William Gomis — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 2-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.9 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Hyder Amil
Distance 88.2% (norm 85.7%) · Clinch 7.0% (norm 6.1%) · Ground 4.8% (norm 6.5%)
William Gomis
Distance 89.0% (norm 85.7%) · Clinch 10.3% (norm 6.1%) · Ground 0.7% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Hyder Amil
Head 75.1% (norm 77.4%) · Body 14.1% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 10.7% (norm 7.8%)
William Gomis
Head 60.6% (norm 77.4%) · Body 23.0% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 16.3% (norm 7.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Amil L/A | Acc | Featherweight med | Gomis L/A | Acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 264 / 518 | 51.0% | 40.9% | 271 / 599 | 45.2% | 40.9% |
| In the clinch | 25 / 41 | 61.0% | 70.8% | 53 / 69 | 76.8% | 70.8% |
| On the ground | 20 / 28 | 71.4% | 69.2% | 3 / 5 | too few to rate | 69.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 196 / 441 | 44.4% | 37.2% | 137 / 408 | 33.6% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 67 / 83 | 80.7% | 68.2% | 94 / 155 | 60.6% | 68.2% |
| To the legs | 46 / 63 | 73.0% | 80.7% | 96 / 110 | 87.3% | 80.7% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Featherweight: 126 fighters · Featherweight: 126 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Amil L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med | vs Gomis L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 179 / 379 | 47.2% | 39.2% | 218 / 631 | 34.5% | 39.2% |
| In the clinch | 17 / 26 | 65.4% | 70.3% | 40 / 53 | 75.5% | 70.3% |
| On the ground | 14 / 21 | too few to rate | 69.4% | 8 / 9 | too few to rate | 69.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 146 / 345 | 42.3% | 35.9% | 110 / 464 | 23.7% | 35.9% |
| To the body | 49 / 65 | 75.4% | 67.9% | 83 / 121 | 68.6% | 67.9% |
| To the legs | 15 / 16 | too few to rate | 81.5% | 73 / 108 | 67.6% | 81.5% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Gomis has more cage time on record.