Gillian Robertson vs.
Michelle Waterson-Gomez
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Gillian Robertson
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 14 | 6 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 3 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.36 · 14 tier-1/2 wins · 12 finish wins over 25 documented bouts
In the UFC: 5-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.6 wins over .500
Michelle Waterson-Gomez
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 6 | 9 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 12 | 4 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.47 · 6 tier-1/2 wins · 12 finish wins over 31 documented bouts
In the UFC: 3-9 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.1 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Gillian Robertson
Distance 68.0% (norm 87.6%) · Clinch 2.3% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 29.8% (norm 4.9%)
Michelle Waterson-Gomez
Distance 83.0% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 10.5% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 6.5% (norm 5.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Gillian Robertson
Head 74.8% (norm 78.1%) · Body 13.9% (norm 14.2%) · Legs 11.3% (norm 7.7%)
Michelle Waterson-Gomez
Head 64.4% (norm 76.4%) · Body 19.4% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 16.2% (norm 9.1%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Robertson L/A | Acc | Women's Flyweight med | Waterson-Gomez L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 281 / 785 | 35.8% | 39.9% | 546 / 1413 | 38.6% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 20 / 26 | 76.9% | 73.3% | 146 / 179 | 81.6% | 72.6% |
| On the ground | 259 / 344 | 75.3% | 74.7% | 88 / 111 | 79.3% | 75.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 377 / 864 | 43.6% | 34.9% | 366 / 1097 | 33.4% | 35.4% |
| To the body | 90 / 160 | 56.2% | 69.5% | 222 / 330 | 67.3% | 69.3% |
| To the legs | 93 / 131 | 71.0% | 82.6% | 192 / 276 | 69.6% | 77.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Flyweight: 46 fighters · Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Robertson L/A | Opp acc | Women's Flyweight med | vs Waterson-Gomez L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 407 / 1127 | 36.1% | 38.8% | 619 / 1447 | 42.8% | 39.7% |
| In the clinch | 55 / 70 | 78.6% | 74.1% | 239 / 302 | 79.1% | 71.5% |
| On the ground | 128 / 145 | 88.3% | 73.4% | 133 / 156 | 85.3% | 74.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 452 / 1161 | 38.9% | 35.3% | 536 / 1292 | 41.5% | 36.0% |
| To the body | 90 / 119 | 75.6% | 69.0% | 263 / 362 | 72.7% | 68.4% |
| To the legs | 48 / 62 | 77.4% | 78.7% | 192 / 251 | 76.5% | 79.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Robertson has more cage time on record.