Germaine de Randamie vs.
Larissa Pacheco
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Germaine de Randamie
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 7 | 3 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 3 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.04 · 7 tier-1/2 wins · 5 finish wins over 15 documented bouts
In the UFC: 4-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.5 wins over .500
Larissa Pacheco
Full career not yet synced for Larissa Pacheco — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.5 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Germaine de Randamie
Distance 75.9% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 20.9% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 3.2% (norm 7.5%)
Larissa Pacheco
Distance 93.2% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 1.4% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 5.5% (norm 7.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Germaine de Randamie
Head 69.4% (norm 75.2%) · Body 19.5% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 11.1% (norm 8.8%)
Larissa Pacheco
Head 82.2% (norm 75.2%) · Body 6.8% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 11.0% (norm 8.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Randamie L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med | Pacheco L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 188 / 501 | 37.5% | 38.3% | 11 / 68 | 16.2% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 118 / 138 | 85.5% | 73.3% | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 73.3% |
| On the ground | 11 / 21 | too few to rate | 70.8% | 2 / 4 | too few to rate | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 150 / 458 | 32.8% | 37.7% | 9 / 60 | 15.0% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 108 / 129 | 83.7% | 70.0% | 2 / 5 | too few to rate | 70.0% |
| To the legs | 59 / 73 | 80.8% | 80.9% | 3 / 8 | too few to rate | 80.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Randamie L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med | vs Pacheco L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 141 / 513 | 27.5% | 41.3% | 29 / 87 | 33.3% | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 48 / 60 | 80.0% | 74.7% | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 74.7% |
| On the ground | 85 / 204 | 41.7% | 74.2% | 18 / 20 | too few to rate | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 136 / 578 | 23.5% | 38.1% | 40 / 95 | 42.1% | 38.1% |
| To the body | 62 / 97 | 63.9% | 73.2% | 5 / 7 | too few to rate | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 76 / 102 | 74.5% | 80.9% | 3 / 6 | too few to rate | 80.9% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Randamie has more cage time on record.