Frank Camacho vs.
Geoff Neal
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Frank Camacho
Full career not yet synced for Frank Camacho — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 1-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.2 wins over .500
Geoff Neal
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 9 | 6 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 3 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 4 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.07 · 12 tier-1/2 wins · 12 finish wins over 24 documented bouts
In the UFC: 6-6 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +4.3 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Frank Camacho
Distance 93.3% (norm 82.8%) · Clinch 6.0% (norm 7.6%) · Ground 0.7% (norm 8.0%)
Geoff Neal
Distance 86.9% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 8.0% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 5.1% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Frank Camacho
Head 86.0% (norm 78.2%) · Body 12.9% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 1.2% (norm 7.9%)
Geoff Neal
Head 90.5% (norm 78.2%) · Body 6.1% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 3.5% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Camacho L/A | Acc | Lightweight med | Neal L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 397 / 891 | 44.6% | 37.9% | 566 / 1177 | 48.1% | 38.6% |
| In the clinch | 44 / 57 | 77.2% | 67.3% | 72 / 108 | 66.7% | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 2 / 7 | too few to rate | 69.1% | 49 / 69 | 71.0% | 67.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 344 / 821 | 41.9% | 35.0% | 585 / 1225 | 47.8% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 90 / 123 | 73.2% | 69.1% | 58 / 82 | 70.7% | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 9 / 11 | too few to rate | 81.9% | 44 / 47 | 93.6% | 82.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Lightweight: 201 fighters · Welterweight: 182 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Camacho L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med | vs Neal L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 449 / 967 | 46.4% | 38.9% | 684 / 1658 | 41.3% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 38 / 51 | 74.5% | 68.6% | 73 / 104 | 70.2% | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 15 / 24 | too few to rate | 68.0% | 7 / 13 | too few to rate | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 347 / 842 | 41.2% | 35.1% | 477 / 1409 | 33.9% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 90 / 126 | 71.4% | 68.1% | 208 / 280 | 74.3% | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 65 / 74 | 87.8% | 81.5% | 79 / 86 | 91.9% | 82.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Neal has more cage time on record.