David Onama vs.
Garrett Armfield
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
David Onama
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 6 | 3 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 8 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.44 · 6 tier-1/2 wins · 11 finish wins over 17 documented bouts
In the UFC: 3-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.4 wins over .500
Garrett Armfield
Full career not yet synced for Garrett Armfield — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 1-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
David Onama
Distance 84.0% (norm 85.7%) · Clinch 5.2% (norm 6.1%) · Ground 10.8% (norm 6.5%)
Garrett Armfield
Distance 87.5% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 4.2% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 8.3% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
David Onama
Head 85.5% (norm 77.4%) · Body 9.2% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 5.2% (norm 7.8%)
Garrett Armfield
Head 84.7% (norm 77.4%) · Body 12.2% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 3.1% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Onama L/A | Acc | Featherweight med | Armfield L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 403 / 854 | 47.2% | 40.9% | 246 / 474 | 51.9% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 38 / 53 | 71.7% | 70.8% | 16 / 23 | too few to rate | 68.7% |
| On the ground | 68 / 110 | 61.8% | 69.2% | 29 / 45 | 64.4% | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 406 / 870 | 46.7% | 37.2% | 223 / 459 | 48.6% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 59 / 94 | 62.8% | 68.2% | 51 / 66 | 77.3% | 66.8% |
| To the legs | 44 / 53 | 83.0% | 80.7% | 17 / 17 | too few to rate | 79.4% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Featherweight: 126 fighters · Bantamweight: 117 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Onama L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med | vs Armfield L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 400 / 881 | 45.4% | 39.2% | 166 / 397 | 41.8% | 39.3% |
| In the clinch | 48 / 77 | 62.3% | 70.3% | 29 / 50 | 58.0% | 70.4% |
| On the ground | 43 / 62 | 69.4% | 69.4% | 3 / 5 | too few to rate | 72.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 312 / 783 | 39.8% | 35.9% | 127 / 362 | 35.1% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 100 / 138 | 72.5% | 67.9% | 53 / 70 | 75.7% | 66.0% |
| To the legs | 79 / 99 | 79.8% | 81.5% | 18 / 20 | too few to rate | 79.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Onama has more cage time on record.