Dan Hooker vs. Gilbert Burns
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Dan Hooker
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 14 | 10 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 10 | 4 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.88 · 14 tier-1/2 wins · 18 finish wins over 38 documented bouts
In the UFC: 11-7 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +3.6 wins over .500
Gilbert Burns
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 15 | 10 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 7 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.21 · 15 tier-1/2 wins · 15 finish wins over 32 documented bouts
In the UFC: 9-10 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +4.2 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Dan Hooker
Distance 89.0% (norm 83.1%) · Clinch 6.9% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 4.1% (norm 8.0%)
Gilbert Burns
Distance 84.3% (norm 80.7%) · Clinch 7.1% (norm 9.6%) · Ground 8.5% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Dan Hooker
Head 73.6% (norm 78.0%) · Body 13.4% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 13.0% (norm 8.0%)
Gilbert Burns
Head 74.4% (norm 78.3%) · Body 13.8% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 11.9% (norm 8.0%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Hooker L/A | Acc | Lightweight med | Burns L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 1002 / 2168 | 46.2% | 38.3% | 737 / 1708 | 43.1% | 38.5% |
| In the clinch | 100 / 167 | 59.9% | 67.5% | 99 / 144 | 68.8% | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 83 / 101 | 82.2% | 68.8% | 138 / 173 | 79.8% | 67.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 729 / 1793 | 40.7% | 35.1% | 571 / 1506 | 37.9% | 36.4% |
| To the body | 216 / 326 | 66.3% | 69.1% | 216 / 279 | 77.4% | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 240 / 317 | 75.7% | 81.8% | 187 / 240 | 77.9% | 83.0% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Lightweight: 204 fighters · Welterweight: 180 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Hooker L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med | vs Burns L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 951 / 2019 | 47.1% | 38.8% | 957 / 2144 | 44.6% | 39.1% |
| In the clinch | 108 / 162 | 66.7% | 68.6% | 89 / 121 | 73.6% | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 154 / 196 | 78.6% | 68.0% | 89 / 126 | 70.6% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 870 / 1914 | 45.5% | 35.2% | 766 / 1896 | 40.4% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 211 / 287 | 73.5% | 68.2% | 196 / 298 | 65.8% | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 132 / 176 | 75.0% | 81.5% | 173 / 197 | 87.8% | 82.2% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Hooker has more cage time on record.