Cole Smith vs. Mitch Gagnon
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Cole Smith
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 1 | 2 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 6 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.78 · 1 tier-1/2 wins · 5 finish wins over 10 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.3 wins over .500
Mitch Gagnon
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 4 | 4 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 8 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.02 · 4 tier-1/2 wins · 11 finish wins over 17 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.8 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Cole Smith
Distance 85.0% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 11.9% (norm 6.2%) · Ground 3.1% (norm 6.4%)
Mitch Gagnon
Distance 70.6% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 16.6% (norm 6.2%) · Ground 12.7% (norm 6.4%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Cole Smith
Head 55.8% (norm 77.5%) · Body 29.2% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 15.0% (norm 8.4%)
Mitch Gagnon
Head 77.3% (norm 77.5%) · Body 16.0% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 6.7% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Smith L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med | Gagnon L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 56 / 192 | 29.2% | 39.2% | 126 / 327 | 38.5% | 39.2% |
| In the clinch | 17 / 27 | 63.0% | 69.0% | 50 / 77 | 64.9% | 69.0% |
| On the ground | 7 / 7 | too few to rate | 70.2% | 39 / 59 | 66.1% | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 33 / 126 | 26.2% | 35.3% | 138 / 358 | 38.5% | 35.3% |
| To the body | 24 / 66 | 36.4% | 66.9% | 52 / 74 | 70.3% | 66.9% |
| To the legs | 23 / 34 | 67.6% | 79.2% | 25 / 31 | 80.6% | 79.2% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Bantamweight: 121 fighters · Bantamweight: 121 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Smith L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med | vs Gagnon L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 53 / 128 | 41.4% | 39.4% | 105 / 348 | 30.2% | 39.4% |
| In the clinch | 16 / 25 | 64.0% | 70.6% | 51 / 71 | 71.8% | 70.6% |
| On the ground | 19 / 22 | too few to rate | 72.1% | 16 / 33 | 48.5% | 72.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 69 / 147 | 46.9% | 34.9% | 86 / 327 | 26.3% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 9 / 16 | too few to rate | 66.1% | 48 / 74 | 64.9% | 66.1% |
| To the legs | 10 / 12 | too few to rate | 78.8% | 38 / 51 | 74.5% | 78.8% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Gagnon has more cage time on record.