Byron Bloodworth vs.
Mike Easton
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Byron Bloodworth
Full career not yet synced for Byron Bloodworth — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.0 wins over .500
Mike Easton
Full career not yet synced for Mike Easton — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 1-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.9 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Byron Bloodworth
Distance 89.8% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 10.2% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 0.0% (norm 6.5%)
Mike Easton
Distance 87.4% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 10.7% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 1.9% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Byron Bloodworth
Head 78.4% (norm 77.4%) · Body 11.4% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 10.2% (norm 8.4%)
Mike Easton
Head 70.0% (norm 77.4%) · Body 16.1% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 13.9% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Bloodworth L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med | Easton L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 19 / 79 | 24.1% | 39.0% | 259 / 828 | 31.3% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 6 / 9 | too few to rate | 68.7% | 79 / 101 | 78.2% | 68.7% |
| On the ground | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 70.2% | 13 / 18 | too few to rate | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 12 / 69 | 17.4% | 34.9% | 144 / 663 | 21.7% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 6 / 10 | too few to rate | 66.8% | 97 / 152 | 63.8% | 66.8% |
| To the legs | 7 / 9 | too few to rate | 79.4% | 110 / 132 | 83.3% | 79.4% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Bantamweight: 117 fighters · Bantamweight: 117 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Bloodworth L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med | vs Easton L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 18 / 74 | 24.3% | 39.3% | 319 / 948 | 33.6% | 39.3% |
| In the clinch | 28 / 28 | 100.0% | 70.4% | 95 / 145 | 65.5% | 70.4% |
| On the ground | 25 / 40 | 62.5% | 72.4% | 13 / 24 | too few to rate | 72.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 34 / 95 | 35.8% | 34.9% | 248 / 872 | 28.4% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 19 / 22 | too few to rate | 66.0% | 88 / 136 | 64.7% | 66.0% |
| To the legs | 18 / 25 | 72.0% | 79.1% | 91 / 109 | 83.5% | 79.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Easton has more cage time on record.