Austen Lane vs. Mario Pinto
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Austen Lane
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 2 | 6 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 2 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 9 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.48 · 4 tier-1/2 wins · 12 finish wins over 22 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.4 wins over .500
Mario Pinto
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 4 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 8 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.82 · 4 tier-1/2 wins · 8 finish wins over 12 documented bouts
In the UFC: 2-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.2 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Austen Lane
Distance 83.6% (norm 79.2%) · Clinch 3.0% (norm 9.8%) · Ground 13.3% (norm 9.3%)
Mario Pinto
Distance 49.2% (norm 79.2%) · Clinch 14.4% (norm 9.8%) · Ground 36.5% (norm 9.3%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Austen Lane
Head 67.3% (norm 79.2%) · Body 20.0% (norm 11.5%) · Legs 12.7% (norm 7.6%)
Mario Pinto
Head 90.1% (norm 79.2%) · Body 5.5% (norm 11.5%) · Legs 4.4% (norm 7.6%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Lane L/A | Acc | Heavyweight med | Pinto L/A | Acc | Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 72 / 138 | 52.2% | 40.1% | 44 / 89 | 49.4% | 40.1% |
| In the clinch | 1 / 5 | too few to rate | 70.4% | 20 / 26 | 76.9% | 70.4% |
| On the ground | 12 / 22 | too few to rate | 70.2% | 60 / 66 | 90.9% | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 43 / 111 | 38.7% | 39.0% | 108 / 163 | 66.3% | 39.0% |
| To the body | 25 / 33 | 75.8% | 77.0% | 9 / 10 | too few to rate | 77.0% |
| To the legs | 17 / 21 | too few to rate | 87.8% | 7 / 8 | too few to rate | 87.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Heavyweight: 93 fighters · Heavyweight: 93 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Lane L/A | Opp acc | Heavyweight med | vs Pinto L/A | Opp acc | Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 58 / 100 | 58.0% | 40.7% | 51 / 138 | 37.0% | 40.7% |
| In the clinch | 15 / 20 | too few to rate | 70.6% | 16 / 24 | too few to rate | 70.6% |
| On the ground | 15 / 18 | too few to rate | 72.2% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 72.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 66 / 114 | 57.9% | 39.3% | 40 / 126 | 31.7% | 39.3% |
| To the body | 8 / 8 | too few to rate | 75.1% | 23 / 29 | 79.3% | 75.1% |
| To the legs | 14 / 16 | too few to rate | 84.4% | 4 / 7 | too few to rate | 84.4% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Lane has more cage time on record.