Yan Cabral vs.
David Mitchell
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Yan Cabral
Full career not yet synced for Yan Cabral — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.2 wins over .500
David Mitchell
Full career not yet synced for David Mitchell — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.0 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Yan Cabral
Distance 67.5% (norm 82.8%) · Clinch 11.0% (norm 7.6%) · Ground 21.5% (norm 8.0%)
David Mitchell
Distance 77.4% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 13.2% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 9.4% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Yan Cabral
Head 86.6% (norm 78.2%) · Body 7.7% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 5.7% (norm 7.9%)
David Mitchell
Head 83.2% (norm 78.2%) · Body 10.7% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 6.1% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Cabral L/A | Acc | Lightweight med | Mitchell L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 58 / 166 | 34.9% | 37.9% | 69 / 281 | 24.6% | 38.6% |
| In the clinch | 19 / 27 | 70.4% | 67.3% | 28 / 48 | 58.3% | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 38 / 53 | 71.7% | 69.1% | 21 / 34 | 61.8% | 67.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 88 / 213 | 41.3% | 35.0% | 79 / 302 | 26.2% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 14 / 19 | too few to rate | 69.1% | 28 / 39 | 71.8% | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 13 / 14 | too few to rate | 81.9% | 11 / 22 | too few to rate | 82.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Lightweight: 201 fighters · Welterweight: 182 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Cabral L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med | vs Mitchell L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 84 / 275 | 30.5% | 38.9% | 66 / 186 | 35.5% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 25 / 36 | 69.4% | 68.6% | 22 / 42 | 52.4% | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 30 / 47 | 63.8% | 68.0% | 52 / 89 | 58.4% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 88 / 283 | 31.1% | 35.1% | 109 / 275 | 39.6% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 30 / 44 | 68.2% | 68.1% | 14 / 22 | too few to rate | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 21 / 31 | 67.7% | 81.5% | 17 / 20 | too few to rate | 82.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Cabral has more cage time on record.