Wang Cong vs.
Victoria Leonardo
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Wang Cong
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 5 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 5 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.55 · 5 tier-1/2 wins · 4 finish wins over 11 documented bouts
In the UFC: 2-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.3 wins over .500
Victoria Leonardo
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 3 | 4 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 2 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 5 | 3 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.42 · 5 tier-1/2 wins · 6 finish wins over 17 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.2 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Wang Cong
Distance 93.0% (norm 87.6%) · Clinch 4.4% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 2.7% (norm 4.9%)
Victoria Leonardo
Distance 90.9% (norm 87.6%) · Clinch 7.8% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 1.3% (norm 4.9%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Wang Cong
Head 61.5% (norm 78.1%) · Body 18.5% (norm 14.2%) · Legs 20.0% (norm 7.7%)
Victoria Leonardo
Head 70.6% (norm 78.1%) · Body 18.8% (norm 14.2%) · Legs 10.7% (norm 7.7%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Cong L/A | Acc | Women's Flyweight med | Leonardo L/A | Acc | Women's Flyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 434 / 768 | 56.5% | 39.9% | 86 / 281 | 30.6% | 39.9% |
| In the clinch | 29 / 36 | 80.6% | 73.3% | 18 / 24 | too few to rate | 73.3% |
| On the ground | 15 / 22 | too few to rate | 74.7% | 3 / 4 | too few to rate | 74.7% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 225 / 508 | 44.3% | 34.9% | 48 / 218 | 22.0% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 114 / 153 | 74.5% | 69.5% | 34 / 58 | 58.6% | 69.5% |
| To the legs | 139 / 165 | 84.2% | 82.6% | 25 / 33 | 75.8% | 82.6% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Flyweight: 46 fighters · Women's Flyweight: 46 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Cong L/A | Opp acc | Women's Flyweight med | vs Leonardo L/A | Opp acc | Women's Flyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 181 / 472 | 38.3% | 38.8% | 170 / 337 | 50.4% | 38.8% |
| In the clinch | 16 / 23 | too few to rate | 74.1% | 33 / 42 | 78.6% | 74.1% |
| On the ground | 0 / 3 | too few to rate | 73.4% | 2 / 6 | too few to rate | 73.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 115 / 368 | 31.2% | 35.3% | 119 / 278 | 42.8% | 35.3% |
| To the body | 46 / 78 | 59.0% | 69.0% | 43 / 60 | 71.7% | 69.0% |
| To the legs | 36 / 52 | 69.2% | 78.7% | 43 / 47 | 91.5% | 78.7% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Cong has more cage time on record.