Viscardi Andrade vs.
Richard Walsh
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Viscardi Andrade
Full career not yet synced for Viscardi Andrade — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.2 wins over .500
Richard Walsh
Full career not yet synced for Richard Walsh — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.2 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Viscardi Andrade
Distance 79.1% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 10.9% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 10.1% (norm 8.1%)
Richard Walsh
Distance 70.1% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 17.2% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 12.8% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Viscardi Andrade
Head 77.4% (norm 78.2%) · Body 15.6% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 7.0% (norm 8.4%)
Richard Walsh
Head 75.3% (norm 78.2%) · Body 13.2% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 11.5% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Andrade L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | Walsh L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 104 / 283 | 36.7% | 38.6% | 159 / 445 | 35.7% | 38.6% |
| In the clinch | 27 / 39 | 69.2% | 67.8% | 73 / 109 | 67.0% | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 21 / 36 | 58.3% | 67.2% | 65 / 81 | 80.2% | 67.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 94 / 277 | 33.9% | 37.2% | 186 / 478 | 38.9% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 37 / 56 | 66.1% | 70.7% | 52 / 84 | 61.9% | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 21 / 25 | 84.0% | 82.9% | 59 / 73 | 80.8% | 82.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 182 fighters · Welterweight: 182 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Andrade L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs Walsh L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 93 / 295 | 31.5% | 39.0% | 158 / 426 | 37.1% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 15 / 27 | 55.6% | 68.9% | 38 / 66 | 57.6% | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 21 / 30 | 70.0% | 68.0% | 14 / 19 | too few to rate | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 101 / 298 | 33.9% | 35.6% | 126 / 389 | 32.4% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 14 / 36 | 38.9% | 69.6% | 41 / 62 | 66.1% | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 14 / 18 | too few to rate | 82.1% | 43 / 60 | 71.7% | 82.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Walsh has more cage time on record.