Vince Morales vs. Colby Thicknesse
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Vince Morales
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 6 | 10 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 10 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.67 · 6 tier-1/2 wins · 12 finish wins over 27 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-6 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.1 wins over .500
Colby Thicknesse
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 2 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 7 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.28 · 2 tier-1/2 wins · 4 finish wins over 10 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -2.0 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Vince Morales
Distance 93.9% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 4.7% (norm 6.2%) · Ground 1.4% (norm 6.4%)
Colby Thicknesse
Distance 74.6% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 4.5% (norm 6.2%) · Ground 20.8% (norm 6.4%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Vince Morales
Head 81.4% (norm 77.5%) · Body 14.2% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 4.4% (norm 8.4%)
Colby Thicknesse
Head 73.0% (norm 77.5%) · Body 19.4% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 7.6% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Morales L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med | Thicknesse L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 488 / 1387 | 35.2% | 39.2% | 93 / 265 | 35.1% | 39.2% |
| In the clinch | 39 / 70 | 55.7% | 69.0% | 10 / 16 | too few to rate | 69.0% |
| On the ground | 15 / 20 | too few to rate | 70.2% | 43 / 74 | 58.1% | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 363 / 1202 | 30.2% | 35.3% | 81 / 259 | 31.3% | 35.3% |
| To the body | 134 / 210 | 63.8% | 66.9% | 41 / 69 | 59.4% | 66.9% |
| To the legs | 45 / 65 | 69.2% | 79.2% | 24 / 27 | 88.9% | 79.2% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Bantamweight: 121 fighters · Bantamweight: 121 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Morales L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med | vs Thicknesse L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 579 / 1311 | 44.2% | 39.4% | 104 / 244 | 42.6% | 39.4% |
| In the clinch | 34 / 49 | 69.4% | 70.6% | 26 / 40 | 65.0% | 70.6% |
| On the ground | 12 / 15 | too few to rate | 72.1% | 2 / 5 | too few to rate | 72.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 333 / 989 | 33.7% | 34.9% | 81 / 217 | 37.3% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 121 / 172 | 70.3% | 66.1% | 35 / 47 | 74.5% | 66.1% |
| To the legs | 171 / 214 | 79.9% | 78.8% | 16 / 25 | 64.0% | 78.8% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Morales has more cage time on record.