Tyler Toner vs. Ian Loveland
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Tyler Toner
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 0 | 1 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 0 | 2 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 15 | 4 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.47 · 0 tier-1/2 wins · 11 finish wins over 23 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Ian Loveland
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 1 | 2 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 17 | 8 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.29 · 1 tier-1/2 wins · 16 finish wins over 28 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.3 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Tyler Toner
Distance 98.7% (norm 85.9%) · Clinch 0.0% (norm 6.0%) · Ground 1.3% (norm 6.5%)
Ian Loveland
Distance 78.9% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 8.2% (norm 6.2%) · Ground 12.8% (norm 6.4%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Tyler Toner
Head 78.2% (norm 77.5%) · Body 6.4% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 15.4% (norm 7.9%)
Ian Loveland
Head 90.5% (norm 77.5%) · Body 8.2% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 1.3% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Toner L/A | Acc | Featherweight med | Loveland L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 20 / 77 | 26.0% | 40.5% | 91 / 240 | 37.9% | 39.2% |
| In the clinch | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 70.5% | 13 / 25 | 52.0% | 69.0% |
| On the ground | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 69.3% | 18 / 39 | 46.2% | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 10 / 61 | 16.4% | 37.1% | 99 / 275 | 36.0% | 35.3% |
| To the body | 4 / 5 | too few to rate | 68.0% | 20 / 25 | 80.0% | 66.9% |
| To the legs | 7 / 12 | too few to rate | 80.3% | 3 / 4 | too few to rate | 79.2% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Featherweight: 127 fighters · Bantamweight: 121 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Toner L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med | vs Loveland L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 31 / 83 | 37.3% | 39.3% | 97 / 288 | 33.7% | 39.4% |
| In the clinch | 3 / 4 | too few to rate | 70.3% | 5 / 8 | too few to rate | 70.6% |
| On the ground | 10 / 25 | 40.0% | 69.4% | 4 / 6 | too few to rate | 72.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 39 / 103 | 37.9% | 35.9% | 39 / 197 | 19.8% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 4 / 7 | too few to rate | 68.0% | 43 / 62 | 69.4% | 66.1% |
| To the legs | 1 / 2 | too few to rate | 81.5% | 24 / 43 | 55.8% | 78.8% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Loveland has more cage time on record.