Tyler Toner vs.
Ian Loveland
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Tyler Toner
Full career not yet synced for Tyler Toner — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
Ian Loveland
Full career not yet synced for Ian Loveland — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.3 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Tyler Toner
Distance 98.7% (norm 85.7%) · Clinch 0.0% (norm 6.1%) · Ground 1.3% (norm 6.5%)
Ian Loveland
Distance 78.9% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 8.2% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 12.8% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Tyler Toner
Head 78.2% (norm 77.4%) · Body 6.4% (norm 12.9%) · Legs 15.4% (norm 7.8%)
Ian Loveland
Head 90.5% (norm 77.4%) · Body 8.2% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 1.3% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Toner L/A | Acc | Featherweight med | Loveland L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 20 / 77 | 26.0% | 40.9% | 91 / 240 | 37.9% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 70.8% | 13 / 25 | 52.0% | 68.7% |
| On the ground | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 69.2% | 18 / 39 | 46.2% | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 10 / 61 | 16.4% | 37.2% | 99 / 275 | 36.0% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 4 / 5 | too few to rate | 68.2% | 20 / 25 | 80.0% | 66.8% |
| To the legs | 7 / 12 | too few to rate | 80.7% | 3 / 4 | too few to rate | 79.4% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Featherweight: 126 fighters · Bantamweight: 117 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Toner L/A | Opp acc | Featherweight med | vs Loveland L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 31 / 83 | 37.3% | 39.2% | 97 / 288 | 33.7% | 39.3% |
| In the clinch | 3 / 4 | too few to rate | 70.3% | 5 / 8 | too few to rate | 70.4% |
| On the ground | 10 / 25 | 40.0% | 69.4% | 4 / 6 | too few to rate | 72.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 39 / 103 | 37.9% | 35.9% | 39 / 197 | 19.8% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 4 / 7 | too few to rate | 67.9% | 43 / 62 | 69.4% | 66.0% |
| To the legs | 1 / 2 | too few to rate | 81.5% | 24 / 43 | 55.8% | 79.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Loveland has more cage time on record.