TJ Dillashaw vs.
John Lineker
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
TJ Dillashaw
Full career not yet synced for TJ Dillashaw — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 9-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +3.8 wins over .500
John Lineker
Full career not yet synced for John Lineker — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 6-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.5 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
TJ Dillashaw
Distance 84.3% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 6.3% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 9.4% (norm 6.5%)
John Lineker
Distance 87.5% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 6.3% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 6.2% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
TJ Dillashaw
Head 81.4% (norm 77.4%) · Body 8.7% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 9.9% (norm 8.4%)
John Lineker
Head 69.5% (norm 77.4%) · Body 25.1% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 5.4% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Dillashaw L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med | Lineker L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 820 / 2303 | 35.6% | 39.0% | 833 / 2199 | 37.9% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 113 / 172 | 65.7% | 68.7% | 78 / 159 | 49.1% | 68.7% |
| On the ground | 190 / 257 | 73.9% | 70.2% | 99 / 156 | 63.5% | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 748 / 2225 | 33.6% | 34.9% | 562 / 1747 | 32.2% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 163 / 237 | 68.8% | 66.8% | 360 / 632 | 57.0% | 66.8% |
| To the legs | 212 / 270 | 78.5% | 79.4% | 88 / 135 | 65.2% | 79.4% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Bantamweight: 117 fighters · Bantamweight: 117 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Dillashaw L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med | vs Lineker L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 633 / 1824 | 34.7% | 39.3% | 666 / 1612 | 41.3% | 39.3% |
| In the clinch | 52 / 96 | 54.2% | 70.4% | 48 / 92 | 52.2% | 70.4% |
| On the ground | 81 / 98 | 82.7% | 72.4% | 91 / 131 | 69.5% | 72.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 545 / 1664 | 32.8% | 34.9% | 525 / 1434 | 36.6% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 132 / 236 | 55.9% | 66.0% | 151 / 244 | 61.9% | 66.0% |
| To the legs | 89 / 118 | 75.4% | 79.1% | 129 / 157 | 82.2% | 79.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Dillashaw has more cage time on record.