Skip to content

Tim Gorman vs. Mitch Gagnon

UFC 0-2-0 vs. 4-4-0

Tale of the tape

Green = edge on that line
0-2-0
UFC record
4-4-0
Bantamweight
Division (benchmark)
Bantamweight
43
AgeΔ 1 yrs
42
5'5"
HeightΔ 0"
5'5"
—
Reach
65"
Southpaw
Stance
Southpaw
143.4
Layoff (months)Δ 53.8 mo
89.6
LL
Last 5 (newest first)
LLLWW

The read

Stats 25%+ off the division median
Mitch Gagnon is a submission threat — 1.93 attempts per 15 minutes, vs a 0.28 Bantamweight norm.
Mitch Gagnon carries real power — 0.58 knockdowns per 15 minutes, vs a 0.29 Bantamweight norm.
Tim Gorman owns the mat — in control 30% of cage time, vs a 18% Bantamweight norm.

Level of competition

Full-career record by tier of opposition

Tim Gorman

Full career not yet synced for Tim Gorman — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).

In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.5 wins over .500

Mitch Gagnon

Competition tierWL
Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin 44
Tier 3 — regional circuit 81

Tier-weighted record quality: 1.02 · 4 tier-1/2 wins · 11 finish wins over 17 documented bouts

In the UFC: 1-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.8 wins over .500

Striking

Career totals · norms = own-division medians

Significant strikes — landed & absorbed

822.73/min · norm 3.52
Sig. strikes landed
2152.76/min · norm 3.52
1675.57/min · norm 3.58
Sig. strikes absorbed lower is better
1722.21/min · norm 3.58
31.8%norm 43.5%
Striking accuracy
46.4%norm 43.5%
47.0%norm 56.6%
Striking defense
61.9%norm 56.6%
00.00/15 · norm 0.29
Knockdowns
30.58/15 · norm 0.29

Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)

Tim Gorman

Distance 92.6% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 6.2% (norm 6.2%) · Ground 1.2% (norm 6.4%)

Mitch Gagnon

Distance 70.6% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 16.6% (norm 6.2%) · Ground 12.7% (norm 6.4%)

What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)

Tim Gorman

Head 94.6% (norm 77.5%) · Body 1.9% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 3.5% (norm 8.4%)

Mitch Gagnon

Head 77.3% (norm 77.5%) · Body 16.0% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 6.7% (norm 8.4%)

Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone

Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.

Zone Gorman L/AAccBantamweight med Gagnon L/AAccBantamweight med
BY POSITION
At distance 72 / 239 30.1% 39.2% 126 / 327 38.5% 39.2%
In the clinch 10 / 16 too few to rate 69.0% 50 / 77 64.9% 69.0%
On the ground 0 / 3 too few to rate 70.2% 39 / 59 66.1% 70.2%
BY TARGET
To the head 75 / 244 30.7% 35.3% 138 / 358 38.5% 35.3%
To the body 2 / 5 too few to rate 66.9% 52 / 74 70.3% 66.9%
To the legs 5 / 9 too few to rate 79.2% 25 / 31 80.6% 79.2%

Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Bantamweight: 121 fighters · Bantamweight: 121 fighters).

What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man

Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.

Zone vs Gorman L/AOpp accBantamweight med vs Gagnon L/AOpp accBantamweight med
BY POSITION
At distance 129 / 259 49.8% 39.4% 105 / 348 30.2% 39.4%
In the clinch 29 / 44 65.9% 70.6% 51 / 71 71.8% 70.6%
On the ground 9 / 12 too few to rate 72.1% 16 / 33 48.5% 72.1%
BY TARGET
To the head 101 / 240 42.1% 34.9% 86 / 327 26.3% 34.9%
To the body 44 / 49 89.8% 66.1% 48 / 74 64.9% 66.1%
To the legs 22 / 26 84.6% 78.8% 38 / 51 74.5% 78.8%

Grappling

Takedowns, control, submissions vs. division norm
29.5% acc · 1.00/15 · norm 1.12
Takedowns landed
625.0% acc · 1.16/15 · norm 1.12
133.3% def · norm 65.7%
Takedowns stopped
2365.7% def · norm 65.7%
8:5929.9% of cage time · norm 17.8%
Control time
17:0021.8% of cage time · norm 17.8%
3:111:35 per 15 · norm 2:24
Time under control lower is better
32:006:09 per 15 · norm 2:24
00.00/15 · norm 0.28
Submission attempts
101.93/15 · norm 0.28

Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Gagnon has more cage time on record.