Thomas Almeida vs.
Albert Morales
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Thomas Almeida
Full career not yet synced for Thomas Almeida — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 1-5 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.3 wins over .500
Albert Morales
Full career not yet synced for Albert Morales — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.0 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Thomas Almeida
Distance 92.8% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 6.7% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 0.5% (norm 6.5%)
Albert Morales
Distance 93.2% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 3.6% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 3.2% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Thomas Almeida
Head 76.1% (norm 77.4%) · Body 12.3% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 11.6% (norm 8.4%)
Albert Morales
Head 80.1% (norm 77.4%) · Body 5.2% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 14.7% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Almeida L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med | Morales L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 388 / 928 | 41.8% | 39.0% | 248 / 750 | 33.1% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 45 / 67 | 67.2% | 68.7% | 11 / 29 | 37.9% | 68.7% |
| On the ground | 2 / 5 | too few to rate | 70.2% | 19 / 26 | 73.1% | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 261 / 761 | 34.3% | 34.9% | 163 / 645 | 25.3% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 80 / 123 | 65.0% | 66.8% | 28 / 42 | 66.7% | 66.8% |
| To the legs | 94 / 116 | 81.0% | 79.4% | 87 / 118 | 73.7% | 79.4% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Bantamweight: 117 fighters · Bantamweight: 117 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Almeida L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med | vs Morales L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 396 / 1098 | 36.1% | 39.3% | 226 / 582 | 38.8% | 39.3% |
| In the clinch | 36 / 47 | 76.6% | 70.4% | 10 / 20 | too few to rate | 70.4% |
| On the ground | 11 / 14 | too few to rate | 72.4% | 58 / 79 | 73.4% | 72.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 306 / 953 | 32.1% | 34.9% | 217 / 559 | 38.8% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 78 / 132 | 59.1% | 66.0% | 39 / 70 | 55.7% | 66.0% |
| To the legs | 59 / 74 | 79.7% | 79.1% | 38 / 52 | 73.1% | 79.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Almeida has more cage time on record.