Terry Etim vs. Edward Faaloloto
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Terry Etim
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 7 | 5 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 9 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.31 · 7 tier-1/2 wins · 14 finish wins over 21 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.3 wins over .500
Edward Faaloloto
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 0 | 2 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 2 | 3 |
Tier-weighted record quality: -0.88 · 0 tier-1/2 wins · 1 finish wins over 7 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.5 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Terry Etim
Distance 92.6% (norm 83.1%) · Clinch 5.8% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 1.6% (norm 8.0%)
Edward Faaloloto
Distance 73.9% (norm 83.1%) · Clinch 26.1% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 0.0% (norm 8.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Terry Etim
Head 75.1% (norm 78.0%) · Body 6.9% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 18.0% (norm 8.0%)
Edward Faaloloto
Head 63.0% (norm 78.0%) · Body 13.0% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 23.9% (norm 8.0%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Etim L/A | Acc | Lightweight med | Faaloloto L/A | Acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 199 / 592 | 33.6% | 38.3% | 10 / 34 | 29.4% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 27 / 37 | 73.0% | 67.5% | 7 / 12 | too few to rate | 67.5% |
| On the ground | 3 / 10 | too few to rate | 68.8% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 68.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 110 / 480 | 22.9% | 35.1% | 3 / 29 | 10.3% | 35.1% |
| To the body | 25 / 44 | 56.8% | 69.1% | 5 / 6 | too few to rate | 69.1% |
| To the legs | 94 / 115 | 81.7% | 81.8% | 9 / 11 | too few to rate | 81.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Lightweight: 204 fighters · Lightweight: 204 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Etim L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med | vs Faaloloto L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 143 / 618 | 23.1% | 38.8% | 14 / 47 | 29.8% | 38.8% |
| In the clinch | 33 / 43 | 76.7% | 68.6% | 11 / 16 | too few to rate | 68.6% |
| On the ground | 92 / 151 | 60.9% | 68.0% | 7 / 16 | too few to rate | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 151 / 607 | 24.9% | 35.2% | 20 / 61 | 32.8% | 35.2% |
| To the body | 50 / 103 | 48.5% | 68.2% | 11 / 14 | too few to rate | 68.2% |
| To the legs | 67 / 102 | 65.7% | 81.5% | 1 / 4 | too few to rate | 81.5% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Etim has more cage time on record.