Stephanie Egger vs. Ailin Perez
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Stephanie Egger
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 4 | 4 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 4 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.65 · 4 tier-1/2 wins · 7 finish wins over 14 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.6 wins over .500
Ailin Perez
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 6 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 7 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.39 · 6 tier-1/2 wins · 6 finish wins over 15 documented bouts
In the UFC: 5-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.2 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Stephanie Egger
Distance 76.0% (norm 80.4%) · Clinch 10.9% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 13.2% (norm 7.3%)
Ailin Perez
Distance 64.6% (norm 80.4%) · Clinch 12.6% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 22.8% (norm 7.3%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Stephanie Egger
Head 80.6% (norm 75.5%) · Body 9.7% (norm 15.0%) · Legs 9.7% (norm 8.7%)
Ailin Perez
Head 65.2% (norm 75.5%) · Body 18.0% (norm 15.0%) · Legs 16.9% (norm 8.7%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Egger L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med | Perez L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 67 / 196 | 34.2% | 38.5% | 152 / 349 | 43.6% | 38.5% |
| In the clinch | 23 / 28 | 82.1% | 74.3% | 52 / 68 | 76.5% | 74.3% |
| On the ground | 30 / 34 | 88.2% | 70.8% | 89 / 123 | 72.4% | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 80 / 208 | 38.5% | 37.7% | 164 / 352 | 46.6% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 19 / 25 | 76.0% | 71.1% | 69 / 97 | 71.1% | 71.1% |
| To the legs | 21 / 25 | 84.0% | 80.8% | 60 / 91 | 65.9% | 80.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Bantamweight: 41 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 41 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Egger L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med | vs Perez L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 112 / 245 | 45.7% | 41.3% | 137 / 367 | 37.3% | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 10 / 18 | too few to rate | 75.0% | 27 / 37 | 73.0% | 75.0% |
| On the ground | 13 / 19 | too few to rate | 74.2% | 22 / 24 | too few to rate | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 55 / 174 | 31.6% | 37.7% | 82 / 284 | 28.9% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 52 / 71 | 73.2% | 73.2% | 45 / 69 | 65.2% | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 28 / 37 | 75.7% | 80.9% | 59 / 75 | 78.7% | 80.9% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Perez has more cage time on record.