Shanna Young vs. Stephanie Egger
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Shanna Young
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 2 | 7 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 9 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.38 · 2 tier-1/2 wins · 6 finish wins over 20 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.2 wins over .500
Stephanie Egger
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 4 | 4 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 4 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.65 · 4 tier-1/2 wins · 7 finish wins over 14 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.6 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Shanna Young
Distance 86.6% (norm 87.5%) · Clinch 6.2% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 7.2% (norm 4.5%)
Stephanie Egger
Distance 76.0% (norm 80.4%) · Clinch 10.9% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 13.2% (norm 7.3%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Shanna Young
Head 78.7% (norm 78.1%) · Body 17.4% (norm 14.5%) · Legs 3.9% (norm 7.6%)
Stephanie Egger
Head 80.6% (norm 75.5%) · Body 9.7% (norm 15.0%) · Legs 9.7% (norm 8.7%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Young L/A | Acc | Women's Flyweight med | Egger L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 108 / 264 | 40.9% | 40.3% | 67 / 196 | 34.2% | 38.5% |
| In the clinch | 18 / 19 | too few to rate | 73.9% | 23 / 28 | 82.1% | 74.3% |
| On the ground | 14 / 22 | too few to rate | 74.4% | 30 / 34 | 88.2% | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 94 / 240 | 39.2% | 36.0% | 80 / 208 | 38.5% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 35 / 53 | 66.0% | 69.5% | 19 / 25 | 76.0% | 71.1% |
| To the legs | 11 / 12 | too few to rate | 82.3% | 21 / 25 | 84.0% | 80.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Flyweight: 47 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 41 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Young L/A | Opp acc | Women's Flyweight med | vs Egger L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 111 / 231 | 48.1% | 39.0% | 112 / 245 | 45.7% | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 56 / 76 | 73.7% | 73.8% | 10 / 18 | too few to rate | 75.0% |
| On the ground | 59 / 95 | 62.1% | 73.4% | 13 / 19 | too few to rate | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 126 / 288 | 43.8% | 35.0% | 55 / 174 | 31.6% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 79 / 92 | 85.9% | 69.0% | 52 / 71 | 73.2% | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 21 / 22 | too few to rate | 78.7% | 28 / 37 | 75.7% | 80.9% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Egger has more cage time on record.