Seo Hee Ham vs.
Danielle Taylor
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Seo Hee Ham
Full career not yet synced for Seo Hee Ham — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.5 wins over .500
Danielle Taylor
Full career not yet synced for Danielle Taylor — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.2 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Seo Hee Ham
Distance 91.0% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 8.2% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 0.8% (norm 5.0%)
Danielle Taylor
Distance 97.3% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 2.6% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 0.1% (norm 5.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Seo Hee Ham
Head 75.4% (norm 76.4%) · Body 16.2% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 8.3% (norm 9.1%)
Danielle Taylor
Head 83.8% (norm 76.4%) · Body 7.6% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 8.6% (norm 9.1%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Ham L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med | Taylor L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 223 / 578 | 38.6% | 38.3% | 195 / 680 | 28.7% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 25 / 52 | 48.1% | 72.6% | 10 / 18 | too few to rate | 72.6% |
| On the ground | 4 / 5 | too few to rate | 75.0% | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 75.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 150 / 479 | 31.3% | 35.4% | 130 / 586 | 22.2% | 35.4% |
| To the body | 64 / 103 | 62.1% | 69.3% | 32 / 53 | 60.4% | 69.3% |
| To the legs | 38 / 53 | 71.7% | 77.9% | 44 / 60 | 73.3% | 77.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters · Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Ham L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med | vs Taylor L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 238 / 690 | 34.5% | 39.7% | 222 / 840 | 26.4% | 39.7% |
| In the clinch | 54 / 82 | 65.9% | 71.5% | 24 / 33 | 72.7% | 71.5% |
| On the ground | 17 / 23 | too few to rate | 74.4% | 2 / 3 | too few to rate | 74.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 190 / 607 | 31.3% | 36.0% | 152 / 711 | 21.4% | 36.0% |
| To the body | 56 / 100 | 56.0% | 68.4% | 58 / 96 | 60.4% | 68.4% |
| To the legs | 63 / 88 | 71.6% | 79.1% | 38 / 69 | 55.1% | 79.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Taylor has more cage time on record.