Sean Sherk vs. Jutaro Nakao
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Sean Sherk
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 9 | 4 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 27 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.32 · 9 tier-1/2 wins · 21 finish wins over 41 documented bouts
In the UFC: 7-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.6 wins over .500
Jutaro Nakao
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 1 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 25 | 19 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.17 · 1 tier-1/2 wins · 21 finish wins over 50 documented bouts
In the UFC: 1-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.5 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Sean Sherk
Distance 73.0% (norm 83.1%) · Clinch 11.3% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 15.7% (norm 8.0%)
Jutaro Nakao
Distance 71.4% (norm 80.7%) · Clinch 21.4% (norm 9.6%) · Ground 7.1% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Sean Sherk
Head 90.6% (norm 78.0%) · Body 3.8% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 5.5% (norm 8.0%)
Jutaro Nakao
Head 57.1% (norm 78.3%) · Body 21.4% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 21.4% (norm 8.0%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Sherk L/A | Acc | Lightweight med | Nakao L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 220 / 873 | 25.2% | 38.3% | 8 / 20 | too few to rate | 38.5% |
| In the clinch | 65 / 135 | 48.1% | 67.5% | 2 / 6 | too few to rate | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 130 / 188 | 69.1% | 68.8% | 2 / 2 | too few to rate | 67.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 311 / 1084 | 28.7% | 35.1% | 4 / 16 | too few to rate | 36.4% |
| To the body | 43 / 46 | 93.5% | 69.1% | 2 / 6 | too few to rate | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 61 / 66 | 92.4% | 81.8% | 6 / 6 | too few to rate | 83.0% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Lightweight: 204 fighters · Welterweight: 180 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Sherk L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med | vs Nakao L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 425 / 1030 | 41.3% | 38.8% | 2 / 9 | too few to rate | 39.1% |
| In the clinch | 52 / 79 | 65.8% | 68.6% | 6 / 8 | too few to rate | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 68 / 104 | 65.4% | 68.0% | 14 / 18 | too few to rate | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 426 / 1062 | 40.1% | 35.2% | 16 / 28 | 57.1% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 93 / 115 | 80.9% | 68.2% | 1 / 2 | too few to rate | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 26 / 36 | 72.2% | 81.5% | 5 / 5 | too few to rate | 82.2% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Sherk has more cage time on record.