Ross Pearson vs.
Chad Laprise
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Ross Pearson
Full career not yet synced for Ross Pearson — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 6-9 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.7 wins over .500
Chad Laprise
Full career not yet synced for Chad Laprise — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 2-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.5 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Ross Pearson
Distance 89.3% (norm 82.8%) · Clinch 8.9% (norm 7.6%) · Ground 1.8% (norm 8.0%)
Chad Laprise
Distance 89.7% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 4.8% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 5.5% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Ross Pearson
Head 73.2% (norm 78.2%) · Body 17.5% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 9.3% (norm 7.9%)
Chad Laprise
Head 78.8% (norm 78.2%) · Body 12.3% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 8.9% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Pearson L/A | Acc | Lightweight med | Laprise L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 915 / 2470 | 37.0% | 37.9% | 349 / 859 | 40.6% | 38.6% |
| In the clinch | 172 / 245 | 70.2% | 67.3% | 28 / 46 | 60.9% | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 27 / 51 | 52.9% | 69.1% | 33 / 53 | 62.3% | 67.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 588 / 2025 | 29.0% | 35.0% | 239 / 755 | 31.7% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 314 / 485 | 64.7% | 69.1% | 89 / 118 | 75.4% | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 212 / 256 | 82.8% | 81.9% | 82 / 85 | 96.5% | 82.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Lightweight: 201 fighters · Welterweight: 182 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Pearson L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med | vs Laprise L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 977 / 2884 | 33.9% | 38.9% | 250 / 801 | 31.2% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 203 / 307 | 66.1% | 68.6% | 34 / 41 | 82.9% | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 58 / 84 | 69.0% | 68.0% | 24 / 45 | 53.3% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 789 / 2642 | 29.9% | 35.1% | 165 / 685 | 24.1% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 245 / 365 | 67.1% | 68.1% | 61 / 99 | 61.6% | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 204 / 268 | 76.1% | 81.5% | 82 / 103 | 79.6% | 82.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Pearson has more cage time on record.