Ronda Rousey vs.
Amanda Nunes
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Ronda Rousey
Full career not yet synced for Ronda Rousey — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 4-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.9 wins over .500
Amanda Nunes
Full career not yet synced for Amanda Nunes — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 13-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.2 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Ronda Rousey
Distance 55.9% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 29.1% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 15.0% (norm 7.5%)
Amanda Nunes
Distance 73.4% (norm 80.3%) · Clinch 2.9% (norm 9.7%) · Ground 23.8% (norm 7.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Ronda Rousey
Head 82.4% (norm 75.2%) · Body 12.3% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 5.3% (norm 8.8%)
Amanda Nunes
Head 74.9% (norm 75.2%) · Body 11.1% (norm 14.3%) · Legs 14.0% (norm 8.8%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Rousey L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med | Nunes L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 39 / 127 | 30.7% | 38.3% | 639 / 1309 | 48.8% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 50 / 66 | 75.8% | 73.3% | 33 / 51 | 64.7% | 73.3% |
| On the ground | 29 / 34 | 85.3% | 70.8% | 256 / 424 | 60.4% | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 83 / 187 | 44.4% | 37.7% | 629 / 1337 | 47.0% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 24 / 28 | 85.7% | 70.0% | 124 / 198 | 62.6% | 70.0% |
| To the legs | 11 / 12 | too few to rate | 80.9% | 175 / 249 | 70.3% | 80.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 40 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Rousey L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med | vs Nunes L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 85 / 150 | 56.7% | 41.3% | 397 / 1071 | 37.1% | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 28 / 42 | 66.7% | 74.7% | 45 / 66 | 68.2% | 74.7% |
| On the ground | 4 / 5 | too few to rate | 74.2% | 57 / 89 | 64.0% | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 95 / 172 | 55.2% | 38.1% | 338 / 1001 | 33.8% | 38.1% |
| To the body | 16 / 19 | too few to rate | 73.2% | 73 / 109 | 67.0% | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 6 / 6 | too few to rate | 80.9% | 88 / 116 | 75.9% | 80.9% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Nunes has more cage time on record.