Rob Emerson vs.
Nik Lentz
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Rob Emerson
Full career not yet synced for Rob Emerson — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 1-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.4 wins over .500
Nik Lentz
Full career not yet synced for Nik Lentz — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 9-9 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.9 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Rob Emerson
Distance 86.2% (norm 82.8%) · Clinch 8.1% (norm 7.6%) · Ground 5.6% (norm 8.0%)
Nik Lentz
Distance 74.4% (norm 82.8%) · Clinch 13.9% (norm 7.6%) · Ground 11.7% (norm 8.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Rob Emerson
Head 84.4% (norm 78.2%) · Body 4.7% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 11.0% (norm 7.9%)
Nik Lentz
Head 76.4% (norm 78.2%) · Body 15.1% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 8.6% (norm 7.9%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Emerson L/A | Acc | Lightweight med | Lentz L/A | Acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 138 / 519 | 26.6% | 37.9% | 655 / 1686 | 38.8% | 37.9% |
| In the clinch | 27 / 49 | 55.1% | 67.3% | 213 / 316 | 67.4% | 67.3% |
| On the ground | 20 / 34 | 58.8% | 69.1% | 211 / 265 | 79.6% | 69.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 104 / 508 | 20.5% | 35.0% | 650 / 1731 | 37.6% | 35.0% |
| To the body | 21 / 28 | 75.0% | 69.1% | 269 / 342 | 78.7% | 69.1% |
| To the legs | 60 / 66 | 90.9% | 81.9% | 160 / 194 | 82.5% | 81.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Lightweight: 201 fighters · Lightweight: 201 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Emerson L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med | vs Lentz L/A | Opp acc | Lightweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 130 / 455 | 28.6% | 38.9% | 701 / 1584 | 44.3% | 38.9% |
| In the clinch | 37 / 59 | 62.7% | 68.6% | 180 / 262 | 68.7% | 68.6% |
| On the ground | 43 / 83 | 51.8% | 68.0% | 141 / 202 | 69.8% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 130 / 495 | 26.3% | 35.1% | 762 / 1717 | 44.4% | 35.1% |
| To the body | 42 / 56 | 75.0% | 68.1% | 160 / 215 | 74.4% | 68.1% |
| To the legs | 38 / 46 | 82.6% | 81.5% | 100 / 116 | 86.2% | 81.5% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Lentz has more cage time on record.