Rhys McKee vs. Daniel Frunza
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Rhys McKee
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 2 | 5 |
| Tier 2 — LFA / Cage Warriors (feeder belts) | 1 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 12 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.74 · 3 tier-1/2 wins · 14 finish wins over 23 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.5 wins over .500
Daniel Frunza
Full career not yet synced for Daniel Frunza — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -1.5 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Rhys McKee
Distance 93.0% (norm 80.7%) · Clinch 6.2% (norm 9.6%) · Ground 0.8% (norm 8.1%)
Daniel Frunza
Distance 91.5% (norm 80.7%) · Clinch 8.5% (norm 9.6%) · Ground 0.0% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Rhys McKee
Head 83.9% (norm 78.3%) · Body 12.0% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 4.1% (norm 8.0%)
Daniel Frunza
Head 80.9% (norm 78.3%) · Body 9.2% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 9.9% (norm 8.0%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | McKee L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | Frunza L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 276 / 699 | 39.5% | 38.5% | 43 / 129 | 33.3% | 38.5% |
| In the clinch | 26 / 47 | 55.3% | 67.8% | 6 / 12 | too few to rate | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 5 / 6 | too few to rate | 67.0% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 67.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 210 / 631 | 33.3% | 36.4% | 35 / 114 | 30.7% | 36.4% |
| To the body | 72 / 90 | 80.0% | 70.7% | 5 / 13 | too few to rate | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 25 / 31 | 80.6% | 83.0% | 9 / 14 | too few to rate | 83.0% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 180 fighters · Welterweight: 180 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs McKee L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs Frunza L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 309 / 660 | 46.8% | 39.1% | 42 / 110 | 38.2% | 39.1% |
| In the clinch | 83 / 120 | 69.2% | 68.9% | 4 / 9 | too few to rate | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 74 / 105 | 70.5% | 68.0% | 28 / 30 | 93.3% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 345 / 724 | 47.7% | 35.6% | 61 / 133 | 45.9% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 66 / 100 | 66.0% | 69.6% | 7 / 9 | too few to rate | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 55 / 61 | 90.2% | 82.2% | 6 / 7 | too few to rate | 82.2% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — McKee has more cage time on record.