Orion Cosce vs.
Blood Diamond
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Orion Cosce
Full career not yet synced for Orion Cosce — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -1.0 wins over .500
Blood Diamond
Full career not yet synced for Blood Diamond — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.0 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Orion Cosce
Distance 73.5% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 15.4% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 11.0% (norm 8.1%)
Blood Diamond
Distance 61.5% (norm 81.2%) · Clinch 37.9% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 0.5% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Orion Cosce
Head 77.9% (norm 78.2%) · Body 16.2% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 5.9% (norm 8.4%)
Blood Diamond
Head 59.0% (norm 78.2%) · Body 29.7% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 11.3% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Cosce L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | Diamond L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 38 / 100 | 38.0% | 38.6% | 53 / 120 | 44.2% | 38.6% |
| In the clinch | 13 / 21 | too few to rate | 67.8% | 55 / 74 | 74.3% | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 12 / 15 | too few to rate | 67.2% | 0 / 1 | too few to rate | 67.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 40 / 106 | 37.7% | 37.2% | 47 / 115 | 40.9% | 37.2% |
| To the body | 16 / 22 | too few to rate | 70.7% | 46 / 58 | 79.3% | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 7 / 8 | too few to rate | 82.9% | 15 / 22 | too few to rate | 82.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 182 fighters · Welterweight: 182 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Cosce L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs Diamond L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 94 / 193 | 48.7% | 39.0% | 35 / 88 | 39.8% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 46 / 56 | 82.1% | 68.9% | 18 / 32 | 56.2% | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 20 / 24 | too few to rate | 68.0% | 22 / 27 | 81.5% | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 91 / 187 | 48.7% | 35.6% | 59 / 127 | 46.5% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 51 / 61 | 83.6% | 69.6% | 15 / 19 | too few to rate | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 18 / 25 | 72.0% | 82.1% | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 82.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Cosce has more cage time on record.