Norma Dumont vs. Danyelle Wolf
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Norma Dumont
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 9 | 3 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 4 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.38 · 9 tier-1/2 wins · 2 finish wins over 16 documented bouts
In the UFC: 6-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.5 wins over .500
Danyelle Wolf
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 1 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.7 · 1 tier-1/2 wins · 0 finish wins over 2 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.0 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Norma Dumont
Distance 88.2% (norm 72.1%) · Clinch 8.0% (norm 16.0%) · Ground 3.8% (norm 11.9%)
Danyelle Wolf
Distance 96.8% (norm 72.1%) · Clinch 2.1% (norm 16.0%) · Ground 1.1% (norm 11.9%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Norma Dumont
Head 73.9% (norm 73.9%) · Body 14.5% (norm 14.5%) · Legs 11.6% (norm 9.0%)
Danyelle Wolf
Head 84.2% (norm 73.9%) · Body 13.7% (norm 14.5%) · Legs 2.1% (norm 9.0%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Dumont L/A | Acc | Women's Featherweight med | Wolf L/A | Acc | Women's Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 601 / 1283 | 46.8% | 46.8% | 18 / 92 | 19.6% | 46.8% |
| In the clinch | 94 / 116 | 81.0% | 78.3% | 2 / 2 | too few to rate | 78.3% |
| On the ground | 38 / 55 | 69.1% | 69.1% | 0 / 1 | too few to rate | 69.1% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 430 / 1074 | 40.0% | 42.9% | 12 / 80 | 15.0% | 42.9% |
| To the body | 165 / 211 | 78.2% | 78.2% | 7 / 13 | too few to rate | 78.2% |
| To the legs | 138 / 169 | 81.7% | 81.7% | 1 / 2 | too few to rate | 81.7% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Featherweight: 3 fighters · Women's Featherweight: 3 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Dumont L/A | Opp acc | Women's Featherweight med | vs Wolf L/A | Opp acc | Women's Featherweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 372 / 1137 | 32.7% | 32.7% | 33 / 84 | 39.3% | 32.7% |
| In the clinch | 72 / 96 | 75.0% | 75.0% | 6 / 7 | too few to rate | 75.0% |
| On the ground | 9 / 18 | too few to rate | 72.2% | 13 / 19 | too few to rate | 72.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 229 / 868 | 26.4% | 26.4% | 32 / 80 | 40.0% | 26.4% |
| To the body | 132 / 220 | 60.0% | 60.3% | 8 / 10 | too few to rate | 60.3% |
| To the legs | 92 / 163 | 56.4% | 67.6% | 12 / 20 | too few to rate | 67.6% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Dumont has more cage time on record.