Norma Dumont vs. Aspen Ladd
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Norma Dumont
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 9 | 3 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 4 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.38 · 9 tier-1/2 wins · 2 finish wins over 16 documented bouts
In the UFC: 6-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.5 wins over .500
Aspen Ladd
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 7 | 5 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 5 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.23 · 7 tier-1/2 wins · 8 finish wins over 17 documented bouts
In the UFC: 2-3 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.7 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Norma Dumont
Distance 88.2% (norm 72.1%) · Clinch 8.0% (norm 16.0%) · Ground 3.8% (norm 11.9%)
Aspen Ladd
Distance 64.8% (norm 80.4%) · Clinch 11.8% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 23.3% (norm 7.3%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Norma Dumont
Head 73.9% (norm 73.9%) · Body 14.5% (norm 14.5%) · Legs 11.6% (norm 9.0%)
Aspen Ladd
Head 85.7% (norm 75.5%) · Body 11.5% (norm 15.0%) · Legs 2.8% (norm 8.7%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Dumont L/A | Acc | Women's Featherweight med | Ladd L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 601 / 1283 | 46.8% | 46.8% | 136 / 400 | 34.0% | 38.5% |
| In the clinch | 94 / 116 | 81.0% | 78.3% | 52 / 73 | 71.2% | 74.3% |
| On the ground | 38 / 55 | 69.1% | 69.1% | 102 / 144 | 70.8% | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 430 / 1074 | 40.0% | 42.9% | 224 / 529 | 42.3% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 165 / 211 | 78.2% | 78.2% | 51 / 71 | 71.8% | 71.1% |
| To the legs | 138 / 169 | 81.7% | 81.7% | 15 / 17 | too few to rate | 80.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Featherweight: 3 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 41 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Dumont L/A | Opp acc | Women's Featherweight med | vs Ladd L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 372 / 1137 | 32.7% | 32.7% | 235 / 524 | 44.8% | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 72 / 96 | 75.0% | 75.0% | 117 / 143 | 81.8% | 75.0% |
| On the ground | 9 / 18 | too few to rate | 72.2% | 5 / 7 | too few to rate | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 229 / 868 | 26.4% | 26.4% | 187 / 482 | 38.8% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 132 / 220 | 60.0% | 60.3% | 138 / 155 | 89.0% | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 92 / 163 | 56.4% | 67.6% | 32 / 37 | 86.5% | 80.9% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Dumont has more cage time on record.