Natalia Silva vs.
Jessica Andrade
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Natalia Silva
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 8 | 0 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 12 | 5 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.02 · 8 tier-1/2 wins · 12 finish wins over 26 documented bouts
In the UFC: 5-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.4 wins over .500
Jessica Andrade
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 17 | 13 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 9 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.94 · 17 tier-1/2 wins · 18 finish wins over 41 documented bouts
In the UFC: 13-11 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.9 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Natalia Silva
Distance 96.6% (norm 87.6%) · Clinch 1.4% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 2.0% (norm 4.9%)
Jessica Andrade
Distance 79.9% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 13.3% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 6.8% (norm 5.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Natalia Silva
Head 74.4% (norm 78.1%) · Body 14.8% (norm 14.2%) · Legs 10.8% (norm 7.7%)
Jessica Andrade
Head 76.4% (norm 76.4%) · Body 15.2% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 8.4% (norm 9.1%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Silva L/A | Acc | Women's Flyweight med | Andrade L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 474 / 1071 | 44.3% | 39.9% | 1318 / 2995 | 44.0% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 13 / 16 | too few to rate | 73.3% | 308 / 497 | 62.0% | 72.6% |
| On the ground | 15 / 22 | too few to rate | 74.7% | 198 / 255 | 77.6% | 75.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 289 / 825 | 35.0% | 34.9% | 1147 / 2863 | 40.1% | 35.4% |
| To the body | 107 / 164 | 65.2% | 69.5% | 406 / 570 | 71.2% | 69.3% |
| To the legs | 106 / 120 | 88.3% | 82.6% | 271 / 314 | 86.3% | 77.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Flyweight: 46 fighters · Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Silva L/A | Opp acc | Women's Flyweight med | vs Andrade L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 232 / 708 | 32.8% | 38.8% | 1260 / 2987 | 42.2% | 39.7% |
| In the clinch | 14 / 23 | too few to rate | 74.1% | 241 / 355 | 67.9% | 71.5% |
| On the ground | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 73.4% | 96 / 142 | 67.6% | 74.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 130 / 530 | 24.5% | 35.3% | 1094 / 2853 | 38.3% | 36.0% |
| To the body | 58 / 114 | 50.9% | 69.0% | 287 / 401 | 71.6% | 68.4% |
| To the legs | 58 / 87 | 66.7% | 78.7% | 216 / 230 | 93.9% | 79.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Andrade has more cage time on record.