Montel Jackson vs.
Daniel Marcos
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Montel Jackson
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 10 | 4 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 5 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.56 · 10 tier-1/2 wins · 9 finish wins over 19 documented bouts
In the UFC: 4-4 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.4 wins over .500
Daniel Marcos
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 6 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 12 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.49 · 6 tier-1/2 wins · 9 finish wins over 20 documented bouts
In the UFC: 4-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.0 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Montel Jackson
Distance 70.8% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 16.5% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 12.6% (norm 6.5%)
Daniel Marcos
Distance 89.5% (norm 87.4%) · Clinch 8.9% (norm 5.7%) · Ground 1.6% (norm 6.5%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Montel Jackson
Head 82.4% (norm 77.4%) · Body 11.8% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 5.7% (norm 8.4%)
Daniel Marcos
Head 70.0% (norm 77.4%) · Body 17.5% (norm 12.8%) · Legs 12.4% (norm 8.4%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Jackson L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med | Marcos L/A | Acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 250 / 544 | 46.0% | 39.0% | 341 / 663 | 51.4% | 39.0% |
| In the clinch | 97 / 127 | 76.4% | 68.7% | 58 / 66 | 87.9% | 68.7% |
| On the ground | 66 / 97 | 68.0% | 70.2% | 11 / 12 | too few to rate | 70.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 297 / 633 | 46.9% | 34.9% | 253 / 519 | 48.7% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 78 / 91 | 85.7% | 66.8% | 81 / 130 | 62.3% | 66.8% |
| To the legs | 38 / 44 | 86.4% | 79.4% | 76 / 92 | 82.6% | 79.4% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Bantamweight: 117 fighters · Bantamweight: 117 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Jackson L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med | vs Marcos L/A | Opp acc | Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 159 / 435 | 36.6% | 39.3% | 326 / 784 | 41.6% | 39.3% |
| In the clinch | 30 / 38 | 78.9% | 70.4% | 9 / 22 | too few to rate | 70.4% |
| On the ground | 7 / 9 | too few to rate | 72.4% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 72.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 58 / 282 | 20.6% | 34.9% | 179 / 579 | 30.9% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 61 / 104 | 58.7% | 66.0% | 61 / 108 | 56.5% | 66.0% |
| To the legs | 77 / 96 | 80.2% | 79.1% | 95 / 119 | 79.8% | 79.1% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Jackson has more cage time on record.