Miranda Granger vs.
Hannah Goldy
Two full careers, measured against each man's own division and against each other — the tape, the read, and every number behind them.
The men, measured.
Frame, age, layoff and recent form — green marks the edge on each line.
What the numbers say.
Scouting notes, auto-generated — only stats deviating more than 25% from the division median make this list. No narratives, just deviations.
Who did they actually beat?
Full-career records re-graded by the tier of opposition — the same grading the Contender Series pick model uses. Records built on tier-4 competition are worth less than records built on killers.
Miranda Granger
Full career not yet synced for Miranda Granger — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -1.0 wins over .500
Hannah Goldy
Full career not yet synced for Hannah Goldy — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -0.2 wins over .500
The stand-up battle.
Career totals; norms are the medians of each man's own division.
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Miranda Granger
Distance 80.1% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 18.2% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 1.7% (norm 5.0%)
Hannah Goldy
Distance 77.7% (norm 87.6%) · Clinch 18.5% (norm 7.3%) · Ground 3.8% (norm 4.9%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Miranda Granger
Head 66.1% (norm 76.4%) · Body 10.2% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 23.7% (norm 9.1%)
Hannah Goldy
Head 64.3% (norm 78.1%) · Body 22.1% (norm 14.2%) · Legs 13.7% (norm 7.7%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Granger L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med | Goldy L/A | Acc | Women's Flyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 77 / 189 | 40.7% | 38.3% | 136 / 387 | 35.1% | 39.9% |
| In the clinch | 30 / 43 | 69.8% | 72.6% | 61 / 92 | 66.3% | 73.3% |
| On the ground | 4 / 4 | too few to rate | 75.0% | 16 / 19 | too few to rate | 74.7% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 56 / 156 | 35.9% | 35.4% | 92 / 320 | 28.8% | 34.9% |
| To the body | 19 / 24 | too few to rate | 69.3% | 76 / 110 | 69.1% | 69.5% |
| To the legs | 36 / 56 | 64.3% | 77.9% | 45 / 68 | 66.2% | 82.6% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters · Women's Flyweight: 46 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Granger L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med | vs Goldy L/A | Opp acc | Women's Flyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 70 / 196 | 35.7% | 39.7% | 209 / 436 | 47.9% | 38.8% |
| In the clinch | 15 / 24 | too few to rate | 71.5% | 47 / 76 | 61.8% | 74.1% |
| On the ground | 17 / 22 | too few to rate | 74.4% | 6 / 12 | too few to rate | 73.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 51 / 159 | 32.1% | 36.0% | 153 / 371 | 41.2% | 35.3% |
| To the body | 26 / 42 | 61.9% | 68.4% | 54 / 77 | 70.1% | 69.0% |
| To the legs | 25 / 41 | 61.0% | 79.1% | 55 / 76 | 72.4% | 78.7% |
The ground war.
Takedowns, control and submissions — career totals with each man's per-minute rates against his division norm.
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Goldy has more cage time on record.