Miranda Granger vs. Amanda Lemos
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Miranda Granger
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 1 | 3 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 6 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.75 · 1 tier-1/2 wins · 6 finish wins over 10 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-0 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record -1.0 wins over .500
Amanda Lemos
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 9 | 6 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 6 | 0 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.18 · 9 tier-1/2 wins · 11 finish wins over 22 documented bouts
In the UFC: 8-6 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.9 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Miranda Granger
Distance 80.1% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 18.2% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 1.7% (norm 5.0%)
Amanda Lemos
Distance 79.3% (norm 86.9%) · Clinch 8.4% (norm 7.7%) · Ground 12.3% (norm 5.0%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Miranda Granger
Head 66.1% (norm 76.6%) · Body 10.2% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 23.7% (norm 9.1%)
Amanda Lemos
Head 74.6% (norm 76.6%) · Body 16.8% (norm 14.9%) · Legs 8.6% (norm 9.1%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Granger L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med | Lemos L/A | Acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 77 / 189 | 40.7% | 38.3% | 360 / 717 | 50.2% | 38.3% |
| In the clinch | 30 / 43 | 69.8% | 72.6% | 62 / 76 | 81.6% | 72.6% |
| On the ground | 4 / 4 | too few to rate | 75.0% | 79 / 111 | 71.2% | 75.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 56 / 156 | 35.9% | 35.4% | 318 / 674 | 47.2% | 35.4% |
| To the body | 19 / 24 | too few to rate | 69.3% | 111 / 152 | 73.0% | 69.3% |
| To the legs | 36 / 56 | 64.3% | 77.9% | 72 / 78 | 92.3% | 77.9% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters · Women's Strawweight: 63 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Granger L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med | vs Lemos L/A | Opp acc | Women's Strawweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 70 / 196 | 35.7% | 39.7% | 306 / 686 | 44.6% | 39.7% |
| In the clinch | 15 / 24 | too few to rate | 71.2% | 147 / 184 | 79.9% | 71.2% |
| On the ground | 17 / 22 | too few to rate | 74.4% | 115 / 146 | 78.8% | 74.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 51 / 159 | 32.1% | 36.0% | 317 / 673 | 47.1% | 36.0% |
| To the body | 26 / 42 | 61.9% | 68.7% | 141 / 190 | 74.2% | 68.7% |
| To the legs | 25 / 41 | 61.0% | 79.1% | 110 / 153 | 71.9% | 79.1% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Lemos has more cage time on record.