Melissa Croden vs. Chelsea Chandler
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Melissa Croden
Full career not yet synced for Melissa Croden — tier grading appears once their record documentation lands (refreshes weekly).
In the UFC: 2-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.2 wins over .500
Chelsea Chandler
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 3 | 3 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 4 | 1 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.82 · 3 tier-1/2 wins · 4 finish wins over 11 documented bouts
In the UFC: 2-2 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +0.1 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Melissa Croden
Distance 71.5% (norm 80.4%) · Clinch 14.6% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 13.9% (norm 7.3%)
Chelsea Chandler
Distance 73.9% (norm 80.4%) · Clinch 15.4% (norm 9.4%) · Ground 10.7% (norm 7.3%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Melissa Croden
Head 78.0% (norm 75.5%) · Body 13.0% (norm 15.0%) · Legs 9.0% (norm 8.7%)
Chelsea Chandler
Head 80.4% (norm 75.5%) · Body 18.0% (norm 15.0%) · Legs 1.5% (norm 8.7%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Croden L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med | Chandler L/A | Acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 122 / 308 | 39.6% | 38.5% | 123 / 340 | 36.2% | 38.5% |
| In the clinch | 41 / 63 | 65.1% | 74.3% | 50 / 71 | 70.4% | 74.3% |
| On the ground | 38 / 60 | 63.3% | 70.8% | 34 / 49 | 69.4% | 70.8% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 139 / 336 | 41.4% | 37.7% | 141 / 370 | 38.1% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 37 / 56 | 66.1% | 71.1% | 60 / 83 | 72.3% | 71.1% |
| To the legs | 25 / 39 | 64.1% | 80.8% | 6 / 7 | too few to rate | 80.8% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Women's Bantamweight: 41 fighters · Women's Bantamweight: 41 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Croden L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med | vs Chandler L/A | Opp acc | Women's Bantamweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 71 / 212 | 33.5% | 41.3% | 178 / 338 | 52.7% | 41.3% |
| In the clinch | 36 / 48 | 75.0% | 75.0% | 58 / 71 | 81.7% | 75.0% |
| On the ground | 0 / 1 | too few to rate | 74.2% | 12 / 18 | too few to rate | 74.2% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 63 / 205 | 30.7% | 37.7% | 127 / 275 | 46.2% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 37 / 48 | 77.1% | 73.2% | 71 / 99 | 71.7% | 73.2% |
| To the legs | 7 / 8 | too few to rate | 80.9% | 50 / 53 | 94.3% | 80.9% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Chandler has more cage time on record.