Matt Hughes vs. Renzo Gracie
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Matt Hughes
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 18 | 7 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 27 | 2 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 1.36 · 18 tier-1/2 wins · 35 finish wins over 54 documented bouts
In the UFC: 10-6 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.1 wins over .500
Renzo Gracie
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 1 | 1 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 10 | 6 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.25 · 1 tier-1/2 wins · 7 finish wins over 20 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +11.0 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Matt Hughes
Distance 44.0% (norm 80.7%) · Clinch 6.3% (norm 9.6%) · Ground 49.6% (norm 8.1%)
Renzo Gracie
Distance 94.5% (norm 80.7%) · Clinch 5.5% (norm 9.6%) · Ground 0.0% (norm 8.1%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Matt Hughes
Head 81.3% (norm 78.3%) · Body 13.0% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 5.7% (norm 8.0%)
Renzo Gracie
Head 78.9% (norm 78.3%) · Body 16.5% (norm 12.4%) · Legs 4.6% (norm 8.0%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Hughes L/A | Acc | Welterweight med | Gracie L/A | Acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 153 / 425 | 36.0% | 38.5% | 29 / 103 | 28.2% | 38.5% |
| In the clinch | 46 / 61 | 75.4% | 67.8% | 5 / 6 | too few to rate | 67.8% |
| On the ground | 332 / 479 | 69.3% | 67.0% | 0 / 0 | too few to rate | 67.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 364 / 785 | 46.4% | 36.4% | 16 / 86 | 18.6% | 36.4% |
| To the body | 117 / 125 | 93.6% | 70.7% | 14 / 18 | too few to rate | 70.7% |
| To the legs | 50 / 55 | 90.9% | 83.0% | 4 / 5 | too few to rate | 83.0% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Welterweight: 180 fighters · Welterweight: 180 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Hughes L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med | vs Gracie L/A | Opp acc | Welterweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 138 / 430 | 32.1% | 39.1% | 50 / 100 | 50.0% | 39.1% |
| In the clinch | 49 / 62 | 79.0% | 68.9% | 19 / 22 | too few to rate | 68.9% |
| On the ground | 99 / 136 | 72.8% | 68.0% | 1 / 1 | too few to rate | 68.0% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 196 / 503 | 39.0% | 35.6% | 32 / 81 | 39.5% | 35.6% |
| To the body | 63 / 87 | 72.4% | 69.6% | 6 / 6 | too few to rate | 69.6% |
| To the legs | 27 / 38 | 71.1% | 82.2% | 32 / 36 | 88.9% | 82.2% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Hughes has more cage time on record.