Matt Hamill vs. Roger Hollett
Tale of the tape
The read
Level of competition
Matt Hamill
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 9 | 5 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 4 | 3 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.8 · 9 tier-1/2 wins · 7 finish wins over 21 documented bouts
In the UFC: 3-5 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +2.0 wins over .500
Roger Hollett
| Competition tier | W | L |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 — UFC / DWCS / PFL / Bellator / ONE / Rizin | 1 | 2 |
| Tier 3 — regional circuit | 12 | 3 |
Tier-weighted record quality: 0.67 · 1 tier-1/2 wins · 11 finish wins over 18 documented bouts
In the UFC: 0-1 against opponents who walked in above .500 · avg opponent walk-in record +1.5 wins over .500
Striking
Significant strikes — landed & absorbed
Where the fight happens (share of sig. strike attempts)
Matt Hamill
Distance 80.4% (norm 80.5%) · Clinch 6.7% (norm 8.8%) · Ground 12.9% (norm 10.6%)
Roger Hollett
Distance 82.8% (norm 80.5%) · Clinch 15.5% (norm 8.8%) · Ground 1.7% (norm 10.6%)
What they throw (share of sig. strike attempts by target)
Matt Hamill
Head 89.2% (norm 78.5%) · Body 2.5% (norm 11.8%) · Legs 8.2% (norm 9.7%)
Roger Hollett
Head 59.5% (norm 78.5%) · Body 33.6% (norm 11.8%) · Legs 6.9% (norm 9.7%)
Zone accuracy matrix Landed / attempted by zone
Green ≥ division median, red below. UFCStats tracks position and target as separate splits.
| Zone | Hamill L/A | Acc | Light Heavyweight med | Hollett L/A | Acc | Light Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 388 / 1082 | 35.9% | 41.5% | 37 / 96 | 38.5% | 41.5% |
| In the clinch | 55 / 90 | 61.1% | 70.8% | 16 / 18 | too few to rate | 70.8% |
| On the ground | 128 / 174 | 73.6% | 72.9% | 2 / 2 | too few to rate | 72.9% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 467 / 1201 | 38.9% | 39.2% | 23 / 69 | 33.3% | 39.2% |
| To the body | 23 / 34 | 67.6% | 72.0% | 24 / 39 | 61.5% | 72.0% |
| To the legs | 81 / 111 | 73.0% | 82.1% | 8 / 8 | too few to rate | 82.1% |
Zones with fewer than 25 attempts are marked "too few to rate". Each fighter is measured against the median of leaderboard-eligible fighters in his own division (Light Heavyweight: 94 fighters · Light Heavyweight: 94 fighters).
What lands on them Opponents' accuracy against each man
Green ≤ division median — harder to hit than the typical man in his division.
| Zone | vs Hamill L/A | Opp acc | Light Heavyweight med | vs Hollett L/A | Opp acc | Light Heavyweight med |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BY POSITION | ||||||
| At distance | 463 / 1299 | 35.6% | 40.6% | 49 / 124 | 39.5% | 40.6% |
| In the clinch | 69 / 128 | 53.9% | 68.8% | 67 / 81 | 82.7% | 68.8% |
| On the ground | 57 / 99 | 57.6% | 70.4% | 78 / 90 | 86.7% | 70.4% |
| BY TARGET | ||||||
| To the head | 343 / 1209 | 28.4% | 37.7% | 130 / 215 | 60.5% | 37.7% |
| To the body | 110 / 155 | 71.0% | 72.9% | 56 / 69 | 81.2% | 72.9% |
| To the legs | 136 / 162 | 84.0% | 83.1% | 8 / 11 | too few to rate | 83.1% |
Grappling
Bars compare the two men's rates (per-minute / per-15 figures), not raw totals — Hamill has more cage time on record.